I have a 232 that I carry often. It is a reliable, accurate, and relatively easy to shoot .380. I wish I could say that about all the .380s I have shot.
The trigger pull on my sample is OK, but it could still use some work. Unlike my Sig 239, which was great out of the box.
I wish the magazine release was in the more conventional position (it is located on the butt of the pistol and it is a bit of a chore to change magazines quickly, as they are a tight fit in the mag well). The magazines are high quality, however.
The sights are acceptable out of the box, something I really appreciate. You can adjust them for windage, too.
I have a standard blued finish, which is good for weight reasons. The all stainless models have stainless frames (heavier), while the blued ones have aluminum frames. If I was going to do it again I would buy the two-tone version. That has the stainless slide and the aluminum frame. Mine looks like hell due to the scratches and dings it gets from regular carry. YMMV on the finish, but if you can get the two tone for the same $$ then I would highly recommend it.
The grips on the pistol are comfortable but they are stupidly big. I suspect SIG did this to get the pistol in under the GCA68 import regs. I haven't replaced the grips on mine yet, but I will eventually.
The last beef is the cartridge. I have my doubts about the .380 round, but I carry it regardless. The pistol shoots reliably and it is accurate. I trust the thing. I wish it was a 9mm, but it ain't. It is better than relying on my rapier wit and charm, but the .380 is no giant killer.
I would go with a Kahr if I hadn't been burned by them years ago. I had a very early K9 that was a goddamn nightmare. The thing broke, and broke, and broke. They must be better now, but I am afraid to find out with my money.
Best to you,
Cheese