Ive looked at one of these and liked it . Megar has mags for it . Any opinions on it VS Taurus 92

I had one before I could afford a Sig.  I shot the crap out of it and it never failed once.  Kinda heavy, due to the steel frame.  The PT-92 (I still have one of those) is a lighter gun, but unless it's a compact, the A100 is smaller I think.  They're both pretty decent values.  Not much for resale, but I'd just pick the one that feels more comfortable in your hand.

Quoted: I had one before I could afford a Sig.  I shot the crap out of it and it never failed once.  Kinda heavy, due to the steel frame.  The PT-92 (I still have one of those) is a lighter gun, but unless it's a compact, the A100 is smaller I think.  They're both pretty decent values.  Not much for resale, but I'd just pick the one that feels more comfortable in your hand.

Thanks Ross that IS want I wanted to hear , so I'll have to agree I really did like the A100 just never "heard much about them . My little A 75 has never quit . Thanks RL

My A75 started to fail to lock open, but since there weren't any mags availbable at the time I had no way of just trying another mag.  It was a .45.  I'd buy another A-75 in a heartbeat.  I had the A-100 in both .45 and 9mm, and they both worked fine.  Finnish and workmanship wasn't really up there with Sig, or even Taurus.  Once I started buying Sigs, there was little reason to keep the A-100s.  I'd have to give the Taurus the edge in accuracy, but it has a pretty big grip.

Like I said, pick which one you like better.  As long as you're getting a good price on either one, because resale is crap.

I had a A100.......... Miss it alot!