Quoted: hello everyone this is my first post so here it goes.. anybody in here think the G 35 hold a candle to a usp tactical? i personally like the tactical but the 35 is cheaper and also seems nice..
|
Years ago, I was unhappy with the reliabilty of my issue Sig P220. I needed a reliable pistol for SWAT duty, and I was leaning toward an HK. A friend of mine (the guy who talked me into joining the Marine Corps - he's still in) had both an HK .45 and a Glock 21. He let me handle and shoot both extensively, and advised me to go with the Glock (which I had disdain for at the time).
I hated the HK trigger, but the Glock pointed high for me. After some range time, I found I shot the Glock much better. I got used to the grip angle, and the consistent trigger was so eaasy to shoot with that I ended up buying a Glock 21. It has fired many thousands of rounds in training, and confronted many bad guys. I could not be happier with it.
I can shoot headshots at 50 yards with it 100% of the time standing with a barricade (taking my time). Same with the other two Glocks I own (my dept switched about a year ago to Glocks).
I have shot many HK's. I think they are inferior to the Glock in shootability, and one belonging to a Trooper I know malfunctioned on me twice in one day at the range (factory ammo). I have seen one Glock malfunction - shot by a very small female, who was basically limp-wristing it (noone else could make it malfunction - even holding it with two fingers to try to limp wrist it).
The Glock 35 will have a slightly longer barrel, adjustable sights, and a consistent trigger pull - every time - with a short reset. In the hands of a skilled shooter, I think the Glock will do everything a HK USP Tactical will do - maybe more reliably and definitely for less money.
PS - I still thank my friend for putting me onto the Glock. Ron, you're the man (I can still shoot better than you, though, bitch
).