Quoted:
The ammo and gun have both been shot. The ammo is gone, myself and the Mak still exist. ;)
It amazes me sometimes what will spook folks. I bet 99.9% of those in this thread will strap themselves into 2,000lb+ missiles and launch out towards other completely unknown other 2,000lb missiles within the next 24 hours. ;)
There might be some misunderstanding here.
It isn't the practice of this forum to condone shooting firearms and ammunition that sustained damage in a fire - whether surface/aesthetic damage or severe. As with any fire, there's an element of heat involved. Heat does things to metal whether it's noticeable or not. Particulary when it comes to receivers and barrels. For some folks here that have experience in dealing with firearms after they've sustained fire/heat damage, I think most of us will always move to the side of caution without a metallurgy test.
Above all else, I believe almost all the members here prefer safety over "doesn't appear to be that bad" assessments. Regardless of the severity, if everyone said, "Looks okay, go ahead and shoot it," and something were to happen that caused injury to the shooter or others, we wouldn't be doing any of the readers - novice and experienced - any justice. It's definitely the shooter's/owner's discretion as to what they want to do in each case - especially when it involves pointy objects packed in about 125 grains of powder that will be about four inches from one's face and will travel out of a barrel at about 2,300 feet per second.