Quoted: I was really was surprised by the cost of the under folder SAS-7 model, it looks cool but its not worth five extra bills. hr |
I must totally agree with you.
I've always believed that the "standard" fixed stock post and no ban SA M-7 models (the standard, the scope rail models, and the carbines) were very fairly priced, especially when one figures in that they were/are assembled using American based labor and use quite a few American made components. I also believe that Arsenal Inc's status as being a licensed branch of the Bulgarian Arsenal firm should also count for something.
But,........... then one currently sees some of their folding stock versions costing a whopping $500 more than their standard fixed stock models. One has to wonder why they don't make a more concentrated effort to close this gap.
I understand that the extra labor and components used by the Arsenal Inc firm in making these pre ban configured folding stock AK's must be adding some noticable costs,...... but $400-$500?!
Think about it, for a couple hundred dollars more, one can actually probably buy two of their standard fixed stocked AK's! TWO!!! That does not seem right.
Think back to the days before any of the so called "assault weapon bans" were in place, do we all remember that even then there were premiums paid for guns that had extra bells and whistles.
The premiums were definitely there, and I believe should have been, but the premium that Arsenal Inc is currently charging is just nowhere in line with what one would have expected that premium to be.
They should really go back to their meeting rooms and spend some time to try and figure out why they have this wide gap in their guns pricing. They should then spend even a bit more time in trying to figure out how they can close these gaps considerably.
Somehow they were able to keep themselves very efficient when producing the fixed stocked versions, but now seem to have thrown efficiency out the door when it comes to their folding stock models.
If one were to take off the folding stock and it's related components, and then lay them out on a table to see exactly what one is paying extra for,....... then, if one were to also take a good hard look at the extra CNC machining required to make that receiver a folding stock version AK, one would clearly see that there is truly a reason for "some" extra pricing.
But, should this extra labor and components add up to almost the price tag of another standard fixed stock AK? ......... I think not!
Will those layed out components and extra receiver milling add up to $400-$500?....... I think not!
IMO, the extra labor and components used to manufacture a folding stock AK (not including any other added bells & whistles), should probably not add more than a $150 price hike over the price of one of their comparable fixed stock versions.