so...i'm flipping thru my new copy of the "american rifleman"...which is mostly a platform for advertising which is thinly disguised as 'gun reviews'...and start reading (yeah...it's STILL fucking raining here in ohio...something like 72 out of the last 90 days!!!!! muthafucka!) the review of a model '97 ww1 trenchgun which is built by shandong machinery factory no. 1 in the people's republic of china (not to be confused with the longdong dildo factory no. 12 in the peoples republik of commiefornia).

the gun gets a good review, with the worst comments being the filing/finishing work performed by "semi-skilled" labor (duh!!! have they looked at the crap remington, savage, and winchester, ruger, et al are kicking out lately?!?!? talk about "semi-skilled"!)

anyways...this got me to thinking (a rarity these days)...does the nra/"american rifleman" give positive reviews to every advertisement...er...gun review they do? hell, they even gave a good review to that cementme...uh...cetme that they had to send back to century because it shot 2' off point of aim (hey! that sounds like a familiar story!!).

commie guns in "american rifleman. who'lda thunk it.

[disneytunes]it's a small world afterall, it's a small, small world![/disneytunes]

Bob...tha times they are a changin'....

yeah, bob dylan, they certainly are.

nothing new for me, personally. hell, i've probaly owned enough recycled dole pinapple cans (aka norinco and poytechnologies) products to keep 2 chinamen sending their numba 1 sons to harvard medical school over the years.

it's just plain weird the see the official nra rag review cementmes from cai in a good light...and then the assclowz of the world's idea of an AMERICAN trench gun. btw, upon review of the data in the article, i found the accuracy of the clone to be less than stellar.

i finished the piece on high end spanish scatterguns (a 5 minute read, thanks to the "american rifleman" using no three-syllable words...with the notable exceptions of the names of several of the basque firms that produces the fireatms (hell! one maker must have 7 or 8 syllables to his name! he'll never sell well here, in america, where bubba stumbles over "frenchi", "heckler & cock" and "fabrikey nashun-al").

ruger get a huge advertisement article/blurb about some of their wheelgunz and remmy get pages of ink promoting...err...educating us on the merits history of the 870.


man, next time i re-up to the nra, i'll ask if i can just apply some of that subscription price towards "small arms review". at least i know that rag is a for-profit corporation.

sorry, shotar. me and mike e. hold exclusive riaa rights to that tune. please have your son submit $1.27 to me for each time he sang the song. if he is broke, a case of his barmitzvah wine (and none of that cheap manischewitz crap!) will do, in lieu of cash.

the homeland defense department thanks you for your cooperation in guarding america's intellectual property rights.

shalom.

On the American Rifleman TV show tonight(yes, too lazt to read) they reviewed the DSA58. They actually gave it a fair assesment.

don...i couldn't agree more. i also support the goa and ohioans for ccw, as well as the ogca.

shotar, lmao! yeah, i'll bet a draedel, christmas tree and a menorah mixes real funky with the easter bunny and moses!

rot, iirc, in the print version of the dsa review, "ar" expirienced some function problems with the dsa fal, also.

on the tele, they said the malfunctions were with the surplus mags, not the gun.