Robert, there are no such tests that I know of that are available to the averave person.
I agreee that Faklers testing needs to be "re-evaluated"
As for commercial 5.45, Both Wolf and Barnaul are pretty much the same. They both tumble violently, but are not designed to fragment.
I have heard through some sources that it tumbles more or about the same as the military ammo, but can not verify. I also question why the military load would be different if the civilan legal version (that is cheaper to make) is just as good.
I do know of cases where deer have been taken with 5.45 FMJ.
The aguement with the M4 and the 5.45 round is pure logic.
The 5.56 round fired through the M-16 was designed to fragment above a certain velocity. Drop the barrel length down to 14.5 inches for the M4, and you decrease that range to less than 100M IIRC.
The 5.45 round is not nearly as velocity dependant. Its' design makes it effective close to its maximum range. The round was designed for a 16 inch AK barrel.
So comparing the two, the M4 gives you "better" performance out to >100M, and the Ak platform gives you "beter" performance out to its maximum range due to bullet design.
Hope this helps.