After "looking" at this setup and figuring out how it works, I'm thinking that it's so close to useable (with a lighter weight upper), that I might be able to effect an improvement by removing the lubricant from the upper surface of the rearward projecting tang of the disconnector (where it is "captured" by the trigger) and just let it 'wear reduce' the small bit needed. Seems like the 2nd stage would become more obvious, in time, as the disconnector wears down.
I can not feel any creep in the second stage, so working down the hammer, as mentioned in the Armalite article, is not needed.
What I do feel is a sort of 'klunk' in the sear, just shy of the 2nd stage -- If I stop there with the pull, the trigger 'sticks' and will not return if released. I suspect the sear surface is not perfectly flat and the interface/contact point is hanging on a ragged edge, literally.
Looking at the upper, visible portion of the disconnecter tang, the part captured by the rear of the trigger, I see in the center a rough pitted area. The sides are rounded off, and it appears to have been fitted or "timed" with a coarse emery stone or file. No smooth, flat, fine honed or machined surface there. Crude. It makes me dread what the trigger/hammer sear looks like -- might explain that "klunk" sensation in the 1st stage.
The Armalite article does recommend some 500 cycles, untill the trigger group has broken in before tuning, so maybe just remove the lubricant and dry fireing might accelerate this.
Where did I save that "15 minute trigger job" article?