This is a topic that gets a fair bit of regular debate, but here are some answers for you....
Chrome-lined barrels are more durable and generally easier to clean than non-chromed barrels. This is the current spec required for use on military issue M16 and its variants. Without going into a lengthy history, that decision was made back during the Viet Nam war due to problems with malfuctioning weapons in the hostile (on many levels) jungle environment.
Non-lined barrels are generally more accurate. This is because it is difficult (if not impossible) to put down a consistent and uniform chrome plating on the inside of the barrel. These inconsistencies impact accuracy. However, the amount of accuracy you lose to chrome-lined barrels is up to debate. Also, because of not having the chrome lining, the barrel will generally wear faster. How fast will be determined by the type of ammo used, how you clean it, etc. This is pretty much a non-issue if you only shoot a few hundred rounds a year.
My personal call on which one to use depends on what you plan on using the rifle for... if it is going to be a plinker, casual shooter, or kept as a tactical/SHTF rifle, go with the chrome-lined barrel because it will be easier to maintain and whatever accuracy you [i]might[/i] lose will not be noticeable.
However, if you want to use the rifle for varmint hunting over long distances (say, more than 200 yards) or for service rifle matches, it would probably be worthwhile to go with a non-chromed-lined barrel.
HTH,
-Greg