Quoted:
shamayim, are you trying to stir the pot or what? So an [b]AR15[/b] carbine is politically incorrect but a "heavy barrel match type" [b]AR15[/b] rifle is politically correct?
On what planet? [rolleyes]
View Quote
Ok, so less politically incorrect[:D]
You know, it used to be that when the military adopted or significantly modified any of their small arms, the "Rifleman" would have a feature article, with all the details. The last few years all you're going to see is a small notation, if even that. Seen anything in there lately about the Armed Forces increasing issue of the M4? Hell, have you ever seen anything in there about the M4--that it even exists?
Look, I've been an NRA member since 1954 (started in the Junior Program) and a Life Member since 1974. The new "Rifleman" editor is nothing but a hunter, and the handgun people are all into personal defence stuff. Nothing on any military stuff any newer than WW2 (tho the articles they have on those things are very good).
Twenty years ago my wife (at the time) knew that on the evening of the day the "Rifleman" showed up I would read at the supper table, and leave me alone afterward, til I got thru.
Current wife has never experienced that. The mag sits for a day or two, til I get around to it.
I maintain that the pics showing assembly were purposely selected to show a match gun being put together, rather than an M16 or M4 clone. It ain't a big deaL I'm just a bit sad that it's come to the point where (in my opinion) "political correctness" plays a part in such things. It's fine w/me if you think that wasn't an issue in what was photographed. Niether of us is ever going to know for sure.[:D]