Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: So Grant, care to elaborate what you think the reasons may be? Clueless minds want to know!
|
Really hard to say. It is my opinion, that the military has typically chosen poor lights and lasers to outfit the SOPMOD packages. I know for a fact that there is a lot of political BS that goes on inside SOCOM which only ends up screwing the operators.
C4
|
ill second that LE in my area performed several test on them before authorizing them for my LE agency Special response team did a dunk test gun and light go under water and immed. come out...........which a large portion of M3 then failed to activate after doing so...........(agency has a waterbourne LE responsibility) additionally my pers. experience is that after a mag or two of full power .40 the bulb croaks on ya at 18.00 a pop.........I did what many of the blue suited nija guys did in my agency.........buy an X200...................sorry to here that SOF are going to get stuck with that crap..................
|
Roger that,
Hopefully, they ruggedize the crap out of it. (or better yet, do a blank-sheet redesign)
My M-6X experience...
- Needed a laser module replaced (crapped-out on me).
- Needed the back plate replaced...cracked in-half on me..broke the bracket.
- I shot a bezel downrange (came off, with muzzle pressure).
- Lamp died
- Still doesn't keep it's zero after about 200 rounds.
- On a CZ-75, the muzzle-blast dislodges it from the frame after about 10 rounds.
It's just a poor design.
My $80 P22 laser (also by Insight)...performs better.