I have recently done exactly this. And while the vortex is amazing, I would not say it is amazingly better.
First and foremost. The razor is crazy heavy. Even the E version which is 4oz lighter than the original. Going from a TR24 to the razor almost made me throw up it is so much heavier. It changes everything about the way the rifle handles for the worse.
So basically the decision point needs to be can you justify the 1) added expense but most importantly the 2) added weight for the pros of the razor. Those pros being top of the line field of view, the little bit of extra power, and the thin reticle.
I will be honest with you and say that I found the glass quality of the trijicon to be very good and the 4x vs 6x was barely a difference. For instance I have used a strike eagle 1-8 and despite being 8x the TR24 was better at 4x due to clarity. So in regards to the trijicon vs vortex what it comes down to is the different reticle.
The triangle reticle is fast and easy to use, but not “precise”. 3gun competitions out to 200yards max against 12” steel plates is this reticles limit. I don’t even know if more power will fix that, isn’t the triangle like 7 MOA or something? I never did, but I guess if you are hunting the triangle reticle could work out for you a little further since your target is so big, maybe out to 300 for still “precision” hunting with the trijicon.
The razor reticle is clean and clear and the bright dot is really nice, I barely have any time behind my razor but I can tell you that the eye box is much less forgiving than the trijicon; with the razor, head placement is much more important. I like to shoot with the collapsible stock barely extended, so I struggle to get my head in a good position without having to move the stock out more which now places he optic further forward and then the rifle feels heavier.
So, do I think the razor is amazing...yes. Am I considering buying another one...yes. Am I upset that I ever sold my TR24...yes.