Quote History Quoted:
Not sure what you mean by this? The larger FOV, the more forgiving it is of head position making it easier to pick up the dot in the optic. The larger the FOV, the more targets will be visible through the optic. Taken to the extreme, placed at the eye, the dot would always be in the FOV and all targets would always be inside the FOV as well.
I have an MRP so I can place my optic wherever I want. It started out over the forward edge of the mag well and I've crept it back since, settling on all the way back.
I really like the Gen 2 Delta Point, thinking about getting one for my M1 Carbine.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
The FOV argument is misguided, sure the window is larger but that doesn't mean the dot is visible more often.
Not sure what you mean by this? The larger FOV, the more forgiving it is of head position making it easier to pick up the dot in the optic. The larger the FOV, the more targets will be visible through the optic. Taken to the extreme, placed at the eye, the dot would always be in the FOV and all targets would always be inside the FOV as well.
I have an MRP so I can place my optic wherever I want. It started out over the forward edge of the mag well and I've crept it back since, settling on all the way back.
I really like the Gen 2 Delta Point, thinking about getting one for my M1 Carbine.
Basically you don't need FOV exactly, only to see the dot, which is in the center of that window. There's a difference between eyebox (where my head must be relative to the rifle's orientation in order to see the reticle or dot, and FOV. We want wide FOV to see stuff magnified around a scope reticle, but with a 1x optic FOV isn't helpful in that way. We only need to see the dot. It's like a front sight post, it's like the dot is attached to the barrel, but way out at infinity. All that matters is where must your head be to see that dot, and the answer to that is not FOV, but eyebox.
Eyebox is helpful. Red dots have the dot projected at infinity, so you end up with a rectangular eyebox, not a cone. A physically larger window like on a EOTech increases the width of that tubular eyebox, and forward/back placement only provides apparent FOV of the stuff around the dot.
If closeness helped, 99% of us would wear that thing slammed against the back of the receiver closer than an ACOG nose to charging handle, but that turns out not to be the case.