Quoted: Maybe 3rdtk should take his troll shit over to 10-8 and see how it works out for him.
|
IF YOU DONT LIKE TROLLS WHY DO YOU DO IT ALL THE TIME, TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE!
For the intellectually and engineering challenged,Go to WWW.GOOGLE.COM and type in
Patent and TrademarkClick on
United States Patent and Trademark Office Home PageOn left side of page under Patents, click on
SearchClick on
Quick Search in the green box.
Go to
Term 1 and type in
Throw Lever in the box and click on
Search.
Scroll down to line 45 and click on
Buffered Attachment Device.
Scroll down to the heading,
Description. Go 7 lines down below description heading to the highlighted
Throw Lever used in Swans Patent dated Nov. 92.
The Tradename was awarded by the Patent office because the term was only utilized for attaching optics, etc., a very clear and encompassing Patent description.
Throw Lever just in the Swan Patent of 13 years ago, was used 11 times. According to facts presented by the U.S. Patent office your B.S. arguments are not with me. Tell the Patent office their records are wrong and you know more than them.
If ARMS mounts weren't the top of the line success story, Larue and others wouldn't be trying to mimick them.
I don't work for ARMS, but there is a small element on this website that attack and create nonsense for either profit or an ax to grind, thus this response.
Buy whatever pleases you; I do, but the promotional B.S. needs to be reined in once in a while, by verifiable facts. Showing a damaged product of some company is easy, but to do so in promotion of another, that is basically a copy of the one damaged, is a pretty ignorant promotion. Show us a product that can't be broken, then we can be impressed. Under normal circumstances and use, an M16/ M4 will malfunction before any mount, we hear it all the time. Does it mean we shoud discard the real M16/M4's with real high combat success track record? I think not!
Pomoting knock offs, belongs over in the AIRSOFT AREANA!