Quoted:
Quoted: CQ/T only cause I haven't tried the other setup
|
Then you should not vote.
Also has anyone else noticed that the CQT is winning and NOT ONE PERSON has given a reason as to why its better.
|
Fine. I tried both. I kept the CQT, got rid of the other.
Oh, you want to know why? Because the need to go 1-3 is not predictable in my mind.
How do I know when I'll need to zoom in and out? I don't want to
have to screw with a quick disconnect and storing some piece that goes on and off
the weapon. What do I do, stop in the middle of some situation to store my
magnifier?
I twist the ring on the CQT, I'm at 1.1. I twist it the other way, I'm at 3. All done.
As for the argument that the CQT doesn't go all they way down to 1.1, that argument
is usually given by people that have never looked through one.
It just makes more sense to me to have an all in one. Either is a compromise at one thing
or the other, so you find the best compromise for what you need. To me, having
2 parts to mess with is more trouble than it's worth.
And a plug for the LaRue mount. It's awesome with the CQT!