Guys, the owner of Mueller and I are in the process of nailing down interest in a special Tactical scope. He is very eager to get input.
One question he had - would you prefer a fixed Objective, or an Adjustable Objective? He said that side-focus objectives would add to the cost, though.
Also, he is really trying to guage interest in a special Tactical scope offered exclusively a yet-to-be-named comany - depending on the price and features, he can have these scopes ramped up and produced pretty quickly if there is enough interest to justify it.
Here's another quote from him for your consideration:
We need to emphasize that if cost is a concern, keep the features realistic
and don't ask for features that will drive the costs up. A Side AO is a nice
feature but will begin to drive the costs up. I also see another post where
the user wants full target turrets with out turret covers. If that's the
users desire, he can just leave the covers off our scopes and have exposed
target style turrets, that's the reason behind our current design
(multi-purpose). Leave them on for protection or leave them off for
accessibility."