Quoted: The finish should be the same or better than the rest of the steel parts on your rifle. After machining, the parts are manganese phosphated (hot bath parkerized) followed by application of a dry-lube film.
|
If there is a gray dry-film lube over the parkerizing that would explain the color and look of the parts.
I take it they only use it on the screw & clamp? (as the sight base definately doesn't have any dry film lube)
Thanks for the info - makes me feel much better about the parts.
I've never heard of one of these sights (or any similar sight, even from other brands) being ripped right off the rail. Until that occurs, I'm sure it is just your humble "opinion".
|
Agreed I haven't either - but that is no excuse for poor engineering. The managers at NASA said the same thing about the foam on the fuel tanks - just prior to the Columbia...
You must not have had that toy when you were a kid... Square pegs don't go through round holes.
|
You must not be an engineer - we know how to make square pegs fit into round holes
. The slots in the raill ARE square and the screw should mate with them for optimal security and return to zero. There are a number of ways you can accomplish the 'square peg into the round hole' through the use of sleeves or fixed screws with a nut on the end. Other (lesser) companies have done this.
Just make sure to properly and occasionally tighten the screw.
|
I plan on it - but if were built right from the get-go a screw loosening would have less impact.
it has to hold a heavier object (scope) in place (cross slot) while the rifle tries to recoil rearwards out from under it.
|
You are right - but what is wrong with doing it for a lighter item? The only reason not to is to cut corners and 'do it on the cheap'. Not something I had associated with KAC products.
Besides if the sight gets a heavy impact (say from dropping it as I go for a twinkie
) would not the square peg do a better job of preventing any movement?
Thie 600m BUIS is NOT meant to replace the carry handle. It is designed to act as a BACK UP iron sight in case the user is forced to take a shot without the use of his primary optic (originally, the Leupold Mk4 M3).
|
Isn't the detachable carry handle used as a back up for some soldiers? I seem them attached to handguards all the time (while the M68 is on the receiver).
In effect the KAC 600M is a replacement for the detachable carry handle. Instead of having to carry the handle and reattach it when needed - all the warrior has to do is flip up the KAC. Makes his life much easier.
In any case the point is minimal - the primary focus was the micrometer 'clicks' 5 irregular movements instead of 4 consistent movements.
This was not a requirement specified when the sight was originally designed several years ago. I have seen and played with prototypes that lock in the up position, however I have no idea if KAC plans to release them for public consumption.
|
To be fair the detents are pretty solid (now) I don't know if they will soften over time & use.
Harv, you seem to have lots of knowledge on this sight, do you know if the detents stay as firm after they have been used awhile?
IMHO this sight is a diamond in the rough. Like they built it quick to meet an immediate need, then never went back to refine/improve the design. My points my be minor - as you point out these have been working for a while, but it's the differnce between paying alot for a mediocre sight and paying alot for a great sight.