User Panel
Posted: 9/16/2004 8:10:09 AM EDT
I have been reading and checking these scopes out for a while. And I do believe that they are awesome scopes and very rugged, but why the heck are they so dang expensive??? I could get 2 high quality red dot scopes for the price of 1 ACOG. Am I missing something here?
|
|
if you are getting two quality dot sights for one ACOG (and I am not arguing that you cant) yeah, you are missing something... magnification. The low magnification allows for better accuracy, target ID, light gatehring, range, bullet drop compensation, etc. If those things sound good to you, then yeah, I think it is worth it. If the shooting you do does not require those advantages or you just arent interested in them, then no, it is not worth it.
|
|
Well so far every scope I have checked out has some magnification (however little) but what I meant is that you can get an EOTech for about $399.00, so times that by 2 and you got the price of an ACOG. Now I know there are advantages to the ACOG (not running on battery power) which is cool. Im just not sure if you are paying for the Trijicon name, or whether it really is worth the $900 bucks.... Oh well.....
|
|
No, the ACOG is not worth 1K. Not in my book anyway. That's why I don't have one. The new illuminated low power variables are much more versatile than the ACOG for most users, IMHO. I don't throw my Accupoint equipped rifle out of helicopters so it's a better choice than the ACOG for me. Just my 02.
|
|
ACOGs are sweet pieces of glass. If you've ever looked through one, you'd know why other folks like them.
If you want a magnified battle optic, there is no better choice IMHO. If you want a red-dot, you probably don't want an ACOG. That being said, an ACOG is a better red-dot than a red-dot is an ACOG. Seriously, you're comparing apples to oranges. They're designed for different jobs. If you're like most folks around here, you'll get both eventually. |
|
$1k to one person is different from $1k to a different person.
A better quetsion is, what else is available with similar features? Trijicon Accupoint: BAC, limited BAC reticle choices, no BDC, much larger, more fragile, requires more complicated mounting. conventional 1-5X scopes: no BAC, much more bulky, more fragile, requires more complicated mounting Aimpoint M2 / EOThing: no magnification, no BDC, requires batteries Leupold C/QT: eats batteries, much larger, no real BDC -z |
|
here is my current dilemma.....
I already have an Aimpoint M2 and Aimpoint ML2 on two different AR uppers. This past weekend I ran a 3-gun match that had no rifle targets closer than 50yds. The Aimpoint was not the best choice for that course of fire. It worked once I could identify the targets. {Failing light, silver targets, bad eyes} I am stuggling with the fact that if there is an encounter in CQB that I will likely be able to score hits using an "aim down the barrel" sighting process. However if a target is 80-100yds away I am sorely lacking the vision to identify and shoot those targets. I like the looks of the ACOG with the Dr Optic backup reddot. However, I may even do an ACOG with Dr. Optic and OTAL -- just to cover all the bases. Are they worth $900? Tritium and Fiber Optic illuminated reticle. Super clear and bright glass. Super compact chassis. I think they are worth what we will pay for them. If that is $900 than yes they are worth it. I will probably try to barter for mine. HTH..... |
|
The rule: "You get what you pay for." applies 99.99% of the time when refering to optics. It has been proven over and over and over and....................................................
|
|
With some range time, COM hits to 15-20 yards by just point-shooting the rifle are easy. Beyond this distance, an ACOG is really fast. If you can master BAC, you can use it from about 3' on out.
Having run through the house with a TA11 and then a TA31, I believe it's easier to use the non-magnified BAC (ie, not looking "through" the scope) with the TA31. One thing to consider with any short-range sight (Doctor, JPoint, etc) is that if it's sighted in at a short range (< 25 yards), the trajectory will be very steep compared to the sight plane. For example, if it's 3" above the bore, and it's sighted in for 10 yards, then at 20 yards it will hit 3" high again. -z |
|
Had a TA-31.
Sold it. Bought an Eo. Now I want another ACOG too. Buy both! dg |
|
You don't know what anything is really worth until you own it. (I know this sounds f*cking Zen but hear me out.)
List the features you're looking for, talk to others who have been there before and know what will do what you want, don't compromise, then buy the equipment that satifies those requirements. After your purchase you'll quickly see if you followed your heart or your wallet. If you followed your wallet, you'll constantly have a nagging voice in your head that you settled for less and you'll soon be wishing you'd gone with your heart. Next thing you know you're looking to either dump the original purchase or stick it on a secondary rifle - but you'll still need to buy your originally desired item. If you followed your heart, you will forget what you paid immediately!. You will revel in the joy of acquiring a wonderful piece of equipment and exploiting its features to their fullest. To me, the ACOG was worth the money because I *wanted* a TA-31. I wanted combat glass that was battle proven and was specifically tuned to my rifle - a 20" barrel w/the optic mounted on the carry handle - that would allow me to work from 10 yards to waay out there. It had many more options than the red-dot sights and the reticle's brightness is self-regulated; no buttons is a big plus for an idiot like me. I have used this setup in carbine classes doing close-up shooting and on a 1000 yard range engaging targets out to 600 yards and it's never dissapointed me. I never think about how much it costs. |
|
It is most definitely a yes. www.csgunworks.com [email protected] Here’s some testimonials about CS GunWorks for AR15 Board Mike at CS Gunworks is... |
|
|
That observation, my friend, is right on the money. How many times do I have to experience this before I remember!?!?!?! Buy once, cry once... |
|
|
There you go. I second the opinion |
|
|
If you can find a BAC ACOG for $900.00 , Buy it , See if you think it's worth $900.00 , If it's not , Sell it for $950.00! |
|
|
There have been several posts from people who have purchased or evaluated even more expensive scopes (for exampe, the US Optics SN-4), and, after comparing them to the ACOG, were disappointed in their optic.
There is no other scope that has the features and the quality of the ACOG at any price. A BAC-equipped ACOG is simply the best combat optic that has ever been produced to date. Now, what is that worth TO YOU? I have no idea. -Troy |
|
I scored my TA31 sometime ago for $600.00 (a princely sum at the time) and boy am I glad I did. Holy cow these things have gone up in price. Now I love mine it is just great. I recently neede cash for a quick gun purchase and was considering selling off one of three pices of glass. A Lupy 6.5-20 M1 long range, a Lupy 3.5 -10 M1 Long range and the TA 31. The Lup 6.5 -20 went way before the other two did.
IPSC_GUY |
|
Troy: What do you feel is the best setup to maximize CQB to mid range on a 5.56 platform? Is it just the ACOG, or the ACOG and something else to back it up? Simply your opinion. Ed |
|
|
paid almost that for mine a over a year ago.......would buy another if I could find one.....to answer your question YES!!!
|
|
What MattB said. I love my ACOG. Wouldn't trade it and I'm happy I parted with the $. I bought mine 3 years ago when they were much cheaper. I paid $530 plus shipping at SWFA.com for mine. It's a 3X compact. Couldn't have made a better choice for the most versitile scope posible for the M4.
That being said, the current prices on ACOGs are something to be considered. The magnification is nice, but if I did it today, I'd go with an Aimpoint. My 2 cents |
|
acogs are very awesome optics.... i feel though that they are not as fast at very close distances (25m and under) which happens to the be the distances statisticly most police engagement happen and civilian fire fights... thats why i choose an aimpoint for my optic... and yeah... i may not be able to hit 400m and further accurately... but i seriously doubt my need to ever do so will ever come about...
aimpoint is very fast from 150m... for the military though... acog's are just what the dr. ordered... |
|
In my opinion the ACOG is definatley worth the money. Over the last 8 or so years I have owned TA01's, TA01NSN's, TA11's, and TA31's.....I currently have (3) TA31's....
M4Guru posted some pics of a TA31 (earlier this week) that was on his M4 over in the sandbox....I can't remember the paticulars of the incident but his M4 was completely destroyed, but the TA31 suffered some damage did survive the explosion.... Semper Fi Jeff |
|
Here is the thread that I was talking about. Note that part of the upper receiver is still attached to the TA51 mount. If this doesn't make you a ACOG beliver, nothing will.
Pic of ACOG Semper Fi Jeff |
|
We had some TA31 in stock and now we have only ONE! It is not $900 Bucks.
www.csgunworks.com [email protected] Here’s some testimonials about CS GunWorks for AR15 Board Mike at CS Gunworks is... |
|
It is worth every penny. If you need to make a shoot/don't shoot decision (non-military) and you need to see if the bad guy has something in his hand, and identify that object, you will not be able to do that with a 1X optical device in many cases. For that reason, the ACOG can be priceless. It also does not require batteries and it is battle proven. |
|
|
Quoted:
Here is the thread that I was talking about. Note that part of the upper receiver is still attached to the TA51 mount. If this doesn't make you a ACOG beliver, nothing will. Pic of ACOG Im not sure what you mean. Why would that make me a believer? If the scope still worked, then thats one thing, but otherwise it just looks like scrap metal to me, the same way any other scope would be after something like that..... |
|
Yeah the ACOG is f*cked up, but it faired a lot better than the M4 it was attached to.....But what do I know, I just play airsoft on the weekends....sorry for speaking out of turn |
|
|
Is that what we're calling it now? -Troy |
|
|
Think of being in a combat zone, and the Walmart (and spare batteries) is a long walk away.
The ACOG (fiber opt and tritium) is automatically the right brightness, no matter what the lighting conditions. The brighter the day, the brighter the inverted V shaped "cursor". No tapping buttons or twisting knobs. In near dark, the reticle (or cursor, I call it) is not too bright, but just right. As you go into still darker conditions, the tritium takes over, to give a certain minimum lighting. No matter what the light, the ACOG is just right, no knobs, no batteries, it is always on, always right brighness. And probably 10x stronger than the M16 it is bolted on to. Built like a tank. So, that is why it is worth every penny. You have to actually try one to see this. But then you know. |
|
I played around with a buddy of mines and it was pretty cool. I like how the fiber optic cable draws so much light into the scope. Tritium is cool, but wears out after years. So basically in 6 or 7 years I would have to replace the scope. I really like the ACOG the best out of what I have seen out there and tried, but cant bring myself to pay so dang much for it.... oh well. thanks for all the input fellas...
|
|
Trijicon can rebuild it. |
|
|
The Tritium will actually last 12-15 years. By the time it does where out, Trijicon will have something better out any ways! C4 |
|
|
It will always work during the daytime utilizing the fiber-optic pipe. You can't see the tritium during dayime anyway.
There is a field-expedient way of making the lit reticle MUCH brighter, independent of sunlight and tritium: 100mph tape a keychain-LED on the top of the ACOG, over the fiber-optic pipe. -z |
|
i would like to know the results of the experiment. it is an interesting concept . meat |
|
|
For the darkhouse stage at SMM3G earlier this year, I did something almost identical:
I took my pocket-carry Surefire E2E and taped it to the top of the ACOG, so about 2" of the fiber-optic pipe was in front of the Surefire's lens. With the Surefire turned on, the target was illuminated and the donut was extremely bright-- as bright as an Aimpoint M2's on the highest setting, easily. This kind of setup (perhaps minus the target illumination) is nearly ideal for situations where your eyes do not have time to dark-adapt, or if there are intermittent strobes, or the light level is just low enough that the donut is dim and not very noticable. -z |
|
I don't own one........yet, but from what I've read and heard I will definitely put one on the 20" BBL AR that I plan on buying or building soon.
*is smacked in the head by girlfirend who is reading over his shoulder shouting: You can only shoot one at at time! I want a house!"* I bought a TriPower for now for the 16.x" BBL AR that I currently have because I wanted 1x optic for it. |
|
Earlier this year I bought a used (looked new) TA01 with an ARMS 19 for just over $600. I wear contact lenses & need reading glasses. I have other good quality magnified optics, but this is the ONLY one that works for me with the contacts, no reading glasses and has both the reticle & target in perfect focus. So, I've since bought another TA01, a TA01B and a TA31F. All used, all in perfect condition & the highest price $875 (for the TA1F). I've passed on a couple TA01s with mounts in the $600 range since then only because I have two. I recently just missed a TA01NSN for $699, which I would have bought. The lower end ones are definately worth this & can be had at this price if you wait & watch. ACOGs are GREAT optics.
|
|
jsut got my first one and i believe it is worth every penny and some!!
|
|
Just go ahead and buy her the house and move along. It'll be cheaper that way (no legal fees). |
|
|
Forget about red dots for a moment. If you're talking about a compact magnified accruate clear glass, it's not really that much and in some instances less than other quality magnified glass, ie...Leupold, Swarvoski, Schmidt and Bender, Zeiss etc...................
PS If I spelled any names correctly is was purely by accident. |
|
... except for the smaller size, stronger construction, and much larger field of view. But BAC is what makes the ACOG "magic", and no other optic has it at any price.
-Troy |
|
No...
I can't see spending $900 on ANY optic... I like the ACOG BAC reticle concept, and would be interested in a $200-300 version which ditched the tritium & fiber-optics for batteries. But $900 is a whole 'nother gun... Too rich for an optic... |
|
Alas, that may be true. I'm still going to tell Armalite that you are telling me to buy a house instead of a gun though. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.