User Panel
Posted: 5/19/2003 11:58:56 AM EDT
THIS NEW SPACER ANSWERS THE REQUESTS OF THOSE WHO APPRECIATE THE BENEFIT OF HAVING THE AIMPOINT A BIT FURTHER FORWARD THAN DIRECT RECEIVER MOUNTING ALLOWS. ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=7&f=23&t=102542 WES GRANT MSTN.BIZ |
|
BOUT TIME!!
Now places like GG&G cant dominate the market with equipment that cost you your first born child! |
|
WOW!!!
It would appear that ARMS is paying CLOSE attention to the market, and WE benefit! While I like the GG&G mount, and I'd bet it's a bit lighter, I like this setup even better. -Troy |
|
Interesting... How much extension does it offer compared to a standard 22M68 and how much does it weigh compared to a full spacer?
I think I want to try it (depending on price, of course), but I already have a 22M68, so how much for just the extension spacer? |
|
So does this thing take the place of the spacer on my #22M68? If so I don't think it would work with my normal length Swan Sleeve.
|
|
[wow]
Man, thats great. Thats REALLY great. I am so happy to see this. ARMS is really something else. Every single thing they put out just keeps getting better and better. If you have a normal length SWAN sleeve, just get rid of it all together and use this plus a #40 rear. Saves weight, saves money, forward mounts, its a win-win decision. |
|
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS:
HEIGHT - 0.460", SAME AS FULL SPACER. WEIGHT DIFFERENCE OVER FULL SPACER - NEGLIGIBLE. EXTENSION - APPROX 2 INCHES. WORKS WITH M4 HANDGUARDS - YES, EVEN IF THE #22M68 IS MOUNTED IN THE MOST FORWARD 13TH SLOT. COST $30 PLUS $7 FEDEX. WES GRANT [URL]MSTN.BIZ[/URL] |
|
Quoted: Does it co-witness through BUIS? Bob View Quote Yes; just like the standard (full) spacer, which this replaces. -Troy |
|
SIDE BY SIDE, IF THE KNIGHT'S OFFSET AND ARMS #22M68 WITH SPACER (EITHER FULL OR EXTENSION) ARE ANY DIFFERENT IN HEIGHT, I CANNOT SEE IT WITH THE MARK 1 MOD 0 EYEBALL.
WES GRANT [URL]MSTN.BIZ[/URL] |
|
ARMS sure makes nice stuff. But, when will they update the products page on their website? The #19S still isn't on there, plus all the new SIRs and a myriad of other items.
|
|
Well, that settles the question of what I will do with the $30 refund check I just received from my electric company!
Nice! |
|
I see that this new offering fills a niche for those who want the quick-off mounting. Choices and options are great! [:)] Bring on more! But otherwise this three piece setup doesn't seem any better than the established GG&G and Knight's offerings. Yawn. Maybe I just don't have the ARMS religion/infection?
Well, that settles the question of what I will do with the $30 refund check I just received from my electric company! View Quote Enron sent you money?! [:D] |
|
Wes:
Wow! This looks outstanding! Any pics of it mounting an M2 on a rifle? Thanks, Corey |
|
Quoted: But otherwise this three piece setup doesn't seem any better than the established GG&G and Knight's offerings. Yawn. Maybe I just don't have the ARMS religion/infection? View Quote Let me give you an example of where it is REALLY nice. I've just built a new upper with a flattop, and I wanted a cantilever-mounted AimPoint on it. BUT... I know that down the road I'm going to have a railed free-float tube installed, and would use a standard ARMS #22M68 with full spacer to mount it on the float tube rail. So, I'd be paying $200 for a mount that I would only use for a short time. Now, I can buy the ARMS #22M68 with the cantilever spacer and the standard full spacer for LESS money than, say, the GG&G cantilever mount, and I can reconfigure at will. It also gives me the throw-lever mount that I prefer. That's a pretty nice development to me. -Troy |
|
I've got a GG&G Cantilever, and I love it. But look at how much mounting serface there is on the base of the ARMS unit vs the GG&G or Knights. Think about the convienience of the quick release mount vs the thumb screw on the GG&G or screws on the Knights. Think about the long tested and prooven return to zero throw lever mount. And finally, think about the modularity Troy just mentioned. By merely manipulating the spacer you can have one mount that will work on very nearly any platform. If you are yawning, the advantages went right over your head.
|
|
Posted by Troy...
It would appear that ARMS is paying CLOSE attention to the market, and WE benefit! View Quote Agreed, which is why I hold out hope that they will make a #19S mount that is dedicated to the compact ACOG line (i.e. same height as a TA60 mount). Calling ARMS... |
|
Wes,
Got the extension yesterday. It is great. Thanks for the great service. Ed |
|
Quoted: Wes: Wow! This looks outstanding! [i]Any pics of it mounting an M2 on a rifle?[/i] Thanks, Corey View Quote Hey, he's right. Pics would be great. [;)] Anyone have any they could share? I almost called Wes this week. I'm very comfortable with my current setup, but think this would be better. I'm on the fence but leaning toward getting this.... |
|
I could have been posting a pic, but the damn lazy FedEx guy drove around with my spacer all day, then took it back to the shop since it wasn't technically due until tomorrow... [:(]
-Troy |
|
Mine should be waiting for me when I get home from work tonight. [:D]
|
|
I want to order one, but on the mstn.biz site, I can't find it anywhere.
Can I buy one, PLEASE?!?!?!!!!! [;)] |
|
Y'ALL MUST LIKE THESE THINGS! WE'VE ALREADY RUN OUT, BUT WILL HAVE MORE IN FRIDAY.
SORRY, BUT WE HAVEN'T GOT IT ON THE WEB SITE YET. THE #22M68 EXTENSION HAS ONLY BEEN OUT LESS THAN A WEEK! JUST GO TO THE WEB SITE AND ORDER A REGULAR ARMS #22M68 SPACER. THEN IN "SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS" STATE THAT YOU WANT THE NEW ONE FOR $30. WE'LL GET ONE ENROUTE TO YOU CHOP-CHOP. WES GRANT [URL]MSTN.BIZ[/URL] |
|
WOW
They finally made it. I have been bugging ARMS since last year to build me one of these but they said they were tied down with military contracts and at first they didn't think it would be as strong as a regular spacer. Also they got it out for under $50.00 that is cool. The thing is I just bought a used GG&G cantilever mount TODAY... can't win for losing I guess. Somebody post a pic with an aimpoint in this thing mounted on a rifle, I wanna see. IPSC_GUY finally in the states sends |
|
ARRRGH...its sitting here in town...but they are holding it until next TUESDAY - Express Saver. [:O]
|
|
You guys seem to get the new stuff first. Armsmounts hasn't updated their web-sight in a year. keep up the good work.
|
|
OK... I've ordered it.
Now I get to wait for Santa, I mean the delivery guy to bring my new toy! |
|
[img]photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=12571[/img]
Quickie Digicam shot of the ARMS #40 with Cantilever mount. -Troy |
|
I thought I was going to regret staying up this late, but after seeing that pic Troy I don't. [:)]
And you even have a chopped CH, M4 HG's and fixed front sight. Just light what it would look like on my rifle. I've been having a hard time deciding if this would make a difference on my rifle. Well, here it is prior to the Colt Enhanced M4 stock and CavArms M4 HG's which I've added since this pic. I won't be able to do it without editing, but I'll have to see how much space the new spacer can get me. I'm already maxing out my M68 mount (max'd out is not ideal I realize). So lemme get this pic up and we can compare. [img]http://photos.ar15.com/WS_Content/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=1811[/img] Looks like you also have your M68 in the same position as mine (max forward position). But the front of your Aimpoint is around 4 ribs more forward than mine (as measures on the ribs of your M4 HG's). Yeah, I could measure mine but my rifle is locked away upstairs and my wife wouldn't be happy if I woke everyone up just to measure optic placement. So Troy, how much more do you like this than if it had a standard straight high riser at the same base placement point? I've never really had that "looking through a tube" feeling with my M2. Which is why I have the shred of hesitation on this one. Otherwise it would've been my first and hopefully not last purchase from Wes. [;)] EDITED to fix typos and add info after my pic came up. |
|
With both eyes open, you see both the tube and everything around it. No tunnel vision at all.
-Troy |
|
Let me give you an example of where it is REALLY nice.
I've just built a new upper with a flattop, and I wanted a cantilever-mounted AimPoint on it. BUT... I know that down the road I'm going to have a railed free-float tube installed, and would use a standard ARMS #22M68 with full spacer to mount it on the float tube rail. So, I'd be paying $200 for a mount that I would only use for a short time. Now, I can buy the ARMS #22M68 with the cantilever spacer and the standard full spacer for LESS money than, say, the GG&G cantilever mount, and I can reconfigure at will. It also gives me the throw-lever mount that I prefer. That's a pretty nice development to me. -Troy [?] [/quote] I'm thinking of mounting an aimpoint on my railed FF tube but I thought that it might change POI because of the flex in the tube. Whats your opinion on this? Will the flex make much of a difference? |
|
wes, got your IM; refer to my order "ID 1247". thanks! jim aka ar-jedi |
|
Quoted: I'm thinking of mounting an aimpoint on my railed FF tube but I thought that it might change POI because of the flex in the tube. Whats your opinion on this? Will the flex make much of a difference? View Quote Given that you'd be mounting the sight on the strongest part of the rail (i.e., at the interface between the rail and the upper receiver), there won't be enough change to worry about. -Troy |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I'm thinking of mounting an aimpoint on my railed FF tube but I thought that it might change POI because of the flex in the tube. Whats your opinion on this? Will the flex make much of a difference? View Quote Given that you'd be mounting the sight on the strongest part of the rail (i.e., at the interface between the rail and the upper receiver), there won't be enough change to worry about. -Troy View Quote I ended up trying my friends Aimpoint yesterday and thats exactly how I mounted it. Well now i'm definately geting one now.Thanks Troy! |
|
Quoted: [url]photos.ar15.com/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=12571[/url] Quickie Digicam shot of the ARMS #40 with Cantilever mount. -Troy View Quote AAAGH!! That pic makes my nipples hard! [:D] I want one, NOW! MN |
|
Got mine yesterday. I'll post pics tonight. IMHO, that is THE best mounting option for direct flat top use.
|
|
yeah, would have been nice to get ahold of one of those cantilever ARMS spacers... Before I did the trim job on a Surefire 500A handguard to get clearance for a #38Ext so I could mount my M68 in about the same position.
Does about the same thing as putting an M68 out on the very end of a #38Ext, I don't have mine mounted all the way out on the end of my #38Ext but if I did the overall results would be pretty similar I bet. [img]http://home.bak.rr.com/varmintcong/14.5in/145rdown.jpg[/img] I bet the M68 cantilever spacer would work real nice in combination with some of the nightvision monocular mounts. |
|
[img]http://photos.ar15.com/WS_Content/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=12665[/img]
[img]http://photos.ar15.com/WS_Content/ImageGallery/IG_LoadImage.asp?iImageUnq=12668[/img] |
|
Lumpy196
Not to Hi jack a thread here but what kind of stock is that on your M-4? I haven't seen anything like that before. IPSC_GUY |
|
LUMPY196,
LOOKING GOOD, VERY GOOD! IPSC_GUY, GO AHEAD, HIJACK IT. WE SELL THE STOCKS, TOO! IT IS A VLTOR STANDARD CARBINE MODSTOCK. [URL]http://ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=7&f=22&t=158594&w=myTopicPop[/URL] S/F- WES GRANT [URL]MSTN.BIZ[/URL] |
|
Lumpy,
You should really consider moving your AimPoint a few notches forward... -Troy |
|
Quoted: Lumpy, You should really consider moving your AimPoint a few notches forward... -Troy View Quote You know, I told him the same thing, but that is where he likes it - right Lumpy? |
|
I could make a very long winded thread on why thats exactly where it works for me. Has to do with my eyes and where they bug out at for both eyes open shooting...Wes has got my back on this.
IPSC-Guy...get the Vltor stock. The cheek-weld is GREAT. And the fact that I have it stuffed with Surefire and Aimpoint batteries makes it even cooler. |
|
I ordered mine Friday, and just got it today!!!
[img]http://www.burnerblog.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10001/normal_2003-05-27%20003a%7E0.jpg[/img] I love this mount! Great quality, great service from MSTN, and a future REPEAT CUSTOMER of MSTN's!!! |
|
I think i just found a cost effective solution to my Aimpoint mounting problem! Thanks.
|
|
wes, got my cantilever mount today, just as you said -- what can i say but it's "swweeeeeeeeeeeet!!!!" you should be knighted for bringing this to us. thanks much, Sir Wes. ar-jedi |
|
NEVER HAS A SIMPLE COMPONENT WITH NO MOVING PARTS CREATED SO MUCH INTEREST AND ENTHUSIASM!
THE ARMS #22M68 CANTILEVER EXTENSION MAKES A GREAT AIMPOINT MOUNT, THE #22M68, EVEN BETTER. THANKS FOR THE KIND WORDS, BUT THE SOLE CREDIT GOES TO ARMS. WES GRANT [URL]MSTN.BIZ[/URL] |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.