Why?
From a practical standpoint, the more bullets you have in a magazine, or the longer the length of travel for the mag follower, the greater the chance of a malfunction. For a novelty, no problem. For a defensive implement, you really need to weigh the advantages of the extra capacity against the disadvantages.
Advantage: more bullets possibly available before needing to reload.
Disadvantage: longer, more prone to snagging. longer, precludes shooting from prone position. weapon balance possibly ungainly. greater length of travel increases chances of a failure to feed. you only gain ten extra rounds.
In my estimation, ten more rounds isn't worth the effort. Siimilarly, a Beta C magazine, while offering significantly more ammo than a standard mag, the reliability, or lack thereof, precludes using one in a defensive posture.
Again, as a range toy, go for it. I'm all for supporting consumerism when it comes to gun stuff and don't want you to take this as an attack on your idea. In a defensive role, however, I believe that the science indicates that two 30 round mags beats a single 40 round mag for convenience, reliability and capacity.