Quoted: Weren't Orlites designed to be one use, throw away mags?
|
No. That was the crappy GI paper thin aluminum jobs (just kidding---sort of).
On the original question, the answer is---it depends.
It depends on how deep the bevels at the bottom of the mag entry were cut. It also depends on how late in production the Orlites were made.
See, Orlites were designed to work in Colt M16s, and ARs. And Colt has always cut the bevels on their lowers a lot deeper than the average aftermarket lowers (not just Bushmaster), so there's no problem using them in Colts. Very often, though, when you try them in an aftermarket lower, the rib around the mag hits the bottom of the mag chute, and won't quite seat.. Many folks will take a small file, and thin out the rib on the mag, and then they'll work. The later production Orlites seem to have a thinner side rib than the early ones, and don't need as much shaving, if any.
I've shaved them, first w/the Orlites I used to have, and more recently with the Thermolds I switched over to some years back.
The only other problem I've encountered w/Orlites is that, if you leave them fully loaded for an extended period of time they swell at the sides, and you have a heck of a job inserting them. This is also true of the Canadian made Thermolds, which used a much poorer quality material than the original North Carolina built pieces.
My own plastic mag choice are the North Carolina built Thermolds. In several years of use, I've only had one failure to feed, and later found that the spring in that piece had been put in backward. I did have to do some trimming at the corners of the ribs so they would insert in all of my ARs. Actually, my Bushmaster lower was not the worst. An early Rock River lower required the most trimming of the rib, so I use it as the test piece for any plastic mag I get..
Given the large drop in the price of metal mags lately, my own feeling is that, if you can buy some Orlites, or Canadian Thermolds, and just want them for range mags---don't pay more than 5 or 6 bucks apiece for them. At that price they're worth it; but certainly not any higher.