Excellent responses everyone and thanks to each and every one of you for responding. I have to admit that for a while I was beginning to feel that some may not have really understood my post. Don't get me wrong though because I do appreciate those responses as they were providing great info. What I really was looking for was an answer to the following:
Q - Was my understanding of fragmentation being better than expansion (for defense) in .223 correct?
A - A definite yes
Q - Was my understanding of the main factors involved in acheiving reliable fragmentation correct (most of it's mass/weight in it's base, has a thin copper jacket, and is traveling at least 2700 fps at impact)?
A - Yes except for the 2700 fps part. That only seems to apply for M193 and M855 sized bullets/loads.
Q - Why would the heavier 75gr and up rounds like the Sierra Match King be considered effective when they are barely going above 2700 fps at the muzzle?
A - Because of the length of these bullets and their thin copper jacket, they yaw and fragment at much lower velocities than M193/M855 ammo. It would also seem that upon fragmentation that their higher mass makes for a more impressive and devastating wound cavity.
Q - The most effective and devastating .223 round for use in my AR (which has a chrome lined 16" barrel with a 1:7 twist) at a range of 5-200yards?
A - It would seem that this would be the 75-77 gr. Black Hills or TAP type ammo.
Please let me know if I am wrong for any of the points above.
NOTE FOR PanzerMK7: I wish I had training by Chuck! I didn't ask about 0-5 yards because I figured that at this close of a range that any round would probably fragement reliably. That and I was wondering if anyone might wonder why and ask.
huban:Thanks again everyone!