Quoted:
I think he wants to know about the 6.8x43mm.
View Quote
Anyone want to explain/ do a short summary of what this round is?
[s]Oh, and why 6.8? is that to restrict it from "civilian" use? why not just 6.5? we are talking millimeters, right?[/s]
OK, 6.8=277. Hrrmm Anyone wanna take a poke at why the military in all its wisdom has to go and invent a round starting off with one of the least used calibers out there? (Accuracy wise) No doubt if/when the military standardizes this round it will have production standards for accuracy, etc, but I would think for initial testing it would be so much easier (and a better use of the money that i pay in taxes) to use a round such as the 6.5 or 7 mm that has numerous accurate bullet makers, a track record in long range accuracy, blah blah blah.
expletive. If they want something with more long range damage, why don't they just go with the 6.5-08 (260 rem)? that will have a much better trajectory than anything that is based off the 5.56 necked up. Plus it has proven ease of feeding. the .223/ 5.56x 45 is a little longer than the 43 in 6.8 x 43. Does this mean the round will be a little larger in diameter to compensate? Sort of the short fat retard military round?
I suppose my "attitude" is a little pissy, but some drunk driver totaled my roomates car, ripped his wheel off, then bumped into mine while trying to get home after a long night of drinking. this happened at 2 am. The weird thing is that he was at a bar where my brother is in charge of the sound. Glad my brother is not in charge of the bar, although the police said he was cut off. (A little late, I think)
Thanks