Quoted: Is this a serious rifle when done right?
|
You tell me?
Is it for play, or would you trust your life to one?
|
I use mine mostly for training and "play", but yes I'd trust my life to it if TSHTF.
Are there any tactical advantages left to the 9mm AR?
|
Tactical advantages? 9mm is more easily and more effectively suppressed than .223.
Practical advantages are several, with the ability to shoot at indoor (handgun-only) ranges and cheap ammo (also easier to handload) being foremost among them.
Is it reliable and durable?
|
As with .223 ARs, if built right, yes. Cut corners and results may be "less than optimal". The mags and mag block seem to be the wildcards with the 9mm systems.
Can most conversions feed +P hollowpoint, or is this a FMJ proposition?
|
My 9mm SBR eats the sh*t out of 124+P Gold Dot, and most anything else I feed it.
RRA lowers use modified Uzi mags. How does that system work, or is there a better one?
|
Ditch the UZI mags and shell out for some genuine Colt SMG mags.
I'm curious and could "jump", but wonder if I should waste the time. Can always do a 4th 5.56 gun instead of a 9mm.
|
What do you expect a 9mm AR to do for you? If you think it will do that, go for it. If not, stick with 5.56. I built mine to have a carbine that's easy to suppress, inexpensive to shoot, able to be shot at the local indoor range during the "off season", and having the same manual of arms as my 5.56 ARs. The 9mm AR delivers in all those areas, in spades. A .22LR AR would meet these criteria too, but the recoil of the 9mm is more like that of the 5.56, which enhances the training value. Plus, I'd be OK with grabbing the 9mm in a defensive situation. A .22, not so much.