The DPMS hammer had a distinctly visible different radius on the bottom than either my original bushmaster 5.56 hammer or my new RRA 9mm hammer. The bushmaster and RRA hammer were identical on the bottom end. I might have it backwards, but the DPMS hammer was more perfectly round, with the others having a flat between 2 smaller radii, or an elliptical shape.
ALL the other 5 DPMS hammers in the order that my dealer buddy ordered directly from DPMS looked EXACTLY the same. We didn't bother checking out the other lower end parts. Maybe I will one day.
You are correct that the disconnect engagement was causing the double taps, but I think it was caused by the hammer hook being in a "out of spec" position due to the funky radius. There is very little disconnector engagement with that setup.
I'm not sure what you're getting at by "funshow" parts, but I'd advise against using DPMS hammers without the other corresponding lower end parts, because, at least in my case AR parts are definitely not all the same. There have been many people who report the same effect, so I'm guessing that is the cause.
Oh, and by the way, my DPMS barrel assembly, which shoots great, will not take a front sight base from any other brand that uses taper pins. I tried to retrofit a chopped FSB for use with a low mount optic on a flat top, and the DPMS taper pins spacing was off to the tune of .030." Of course, you can say that these are drilled for each specific barrel, but none of the others I've looked at had that much variance. All other rifles I've seen have been interchangable. I had about 15 USGI FSB's to use for comparison, by the way. AND my DPMS FSB isn't on straight. THAT particular fact took a long time to diagnos and confirm, because it's just a hair, but enough to require my windage to be set WAY right.
Don't get me wrong, my DPMS upper shoots great, but their specs aren't the same as mil-spec, or anybody else's spec. I know it's wordy, but I think the evidence supports my point.