User Panel
Posted: 11/2/2005 6:03:03 AM EDT
Anyone have any info/experience on the MGI quick-change upper receivers? Were these a success or a failure? Good or Bad? ARKAR
Edited to add a link:MGI Uppers |
|
Mine is on its way right now. I will be happy to post once I have used it.
|
|
There are numerous owners on the ARFcom boards here.
I'm sure some will report. Also, you can read the December 2004 issue of Small Arms Review, where there is a very good review of the system by respected gunwriter Jeff Zimba, who is also an ARFcom member. Upcoming articles will soon be seen in NRA's American Rifleman magazine, and another writeup on the MGI upper along with the new Modular Lower receiver system in Small Arms Review. My own experience with the system over 2 years now, has been one of nice accuracy, good zero repeatability, excellent reliability, and great versatility of use. It is the very first quick change barrel system for the AR15 ever to use existing standard AR15 barrels, and was way ahead of the pack 2 years ago, and still is. Designed by the man who designed the M2HB-QCB 50cal quick change barrel system for FN. He knows how to make a quick change barrel system, among other things. The latest spec QCB from MGI includes internal dimensional changes which will accommodate AK47 mags, when used with our upcoming new MGI Modular Lower Receiver system that has interchangeable magwells. This will be a package that breaks new ground in modular options for the AR15 weapons platform. Again, we have gone where nobody else has gone before, and got there first, with the best. If you want "cutting edge" items that are actually purchasable on the commercial market, and not just "future pie in the sky", MGI is the place to watch. |
|
Arkar,
I have had an MGI upper for a few months now. I absolutely love mine. I am currently using it with several length 5.56 barrels, a 458 Socom and a dedicated 22LR barrel. The obvious comparison is to the MRP. I will say that the looks and finish are a bit rougher than the MRP, but what it lacks there it more than makes up in function. No propriatary barrels. No complicated switching (torque wrenches), and the price was very good. The biggest selling point in my mind is the unlimited choice for barrels and calibers. As to functioning, it has been stellar. I checked the repeatability last weekend, again, and found that putting my 458 barrel back in, and putting the scope back on, I was only 2 clicks out (.5 moa) at 100 yards, for windage. This reaffirms what I had been previously seeing. Maybe not good enough for shooting a prairie dog at 300 yards, but plenty good for my big game hunting needs. Probably good enough for bad guy situations. And, this was remounting the scope, with the potential variables there. Not too bad I'd say. Craig edited: I forgot to add that I shot some groups from the bench with the 300 grain X bullet that were well under 1 moa. I am seeing no issues with the upper adversly affecting accuracy. |
|
Since you are the closest thing we have got to an inside man on this, can you pass on my request for a full length 6 o'clock rail as standard equipment if there ever comes a version 2.0 of the CQB upper. The current shorty rail is too far forward to mount a vfg IMHO, and the levers are right where I would put my hand if grasping in the conventional manner. |
|
|
Hi Loaded Drum,
I'm about as "inside" MGI as it gets. Over 5 years with the company, collaborate and assist on designs and testing, do marketing and sales, and customer support. You'd have to talk to Mack himself to get any more inside than me. We currently do stock versions of the QCB with the longer bottom rail on it. This rail extends back as far as the beginning of the release levers on the bottom. It won't allow VFG mounting all the way back, but it will allow mounting about 3" forward of the hinge pin. I've talked with Mack about moving the levers, but it is not possible with the design. It's $45 more, and generally we have them on hand at all times. Since we make more of the other style, sometimes we run out of the longer bottom rail version, but we do try to keep them in stock as best we can. Even if we run out of stock on the longer bottom rail versions, it's usually only a couple of weeks till they are re-stocked. Pretty sure we have some right now. |
|
TWL:
I've got one of the "friction fit" hand guard extensions. Does MGI have anything yet beyond the friction fit? Thanks. |
|
Yes, we now have the "friction fit", with 3 "L-shaped" slots in the extension tube which engage onto 3 small screws in the FF tube, with a "push and twist" method. It is more secure than the friction fit, but uses the same parts, with these mods on them.
We're way behind schedule for the carbon fiber FF tube with modular rails, and I don't think that we'll see that till next year now. |
|
I have handled and fired one that was owned by another board member. I was skeptical at first, but very impressed once I handled it. The only downside I can see is that if you hold the front handguard close to the magwell your hand is right on the cam lock levers, but other than I couldn't really find anything I didn't like about it (except for maybe the appearance of the handguard itself, but that is an individual aesthetic thing...)
|
|
Ryan,
Cool Pic!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's the first time that I've seen the ABS 9mm barrel with the can on it! It looks really, really cool! Love it!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
How do these cool ass handguards attach to the upper receiver? I assume they don't attach like a regular FF handguard as there is no barrel extension flange to clamp between the upper receiver threads and barrel nut.
|
|
TWL, that modular lower is awesome. Thanks for sharing the pic's.
|
|
WOW that is cool, how much will one of these lowers be running?
|
|
We're estimating $500 for the lower with the AR15 magwell, including lower parts kit.
The AK magwell is estimated to be $150 extra. A modded bolt carrier will be needed for using the AK mags in the system, and we will have one available for purchase. |
|
Tom, you forgot $200 for the SBR stamp |
|
|
The only "problem" I have ever seen with one was not the fault of the upper, but still worth mentioning. The way the barrel locks in with the locking "gates" depends on a quality barrel extension - In one case that I know of, the user had a barrel extension that had a much thicker "lip" than it should have and the barrel would not lock into the gun... again, this is the fault of a cheap, out of spec barrel, but something a potential owner should know about. The modular receiver is pretty neat -- a couple of years ago, when the quest for the "golf bag gun" (not like the Wild Geese) was in full swing, there were a few people working with ideas like this... I had a chance to play with one in Arizona that used a modular magwell and it was interesting, but at that point I saw no reason to want to take on home with me... |
|
|
Out of spec barrel extensions can be relatively easily hand-fitted to the QCB system.
I've had to do it a few times, and I can provide instructions to users, if they happen to encounter something like that. |
|
How about a VFG that twists to lock the barrell in the location the levers are? 2 birds one stone.
|
|
I knew about that lower a little while ago but saw a picture for the first time in some gun mag that I had bought to kill time in some doctor's waiting room. I actually said "Oh sh*t!" outloud.
Pretty cool |
|
I had to whittle a bit of material off of my Kuehl 22lr barrel to get it to work. No big deal, just a little elbow grease. I have three other barrels that just dropped right in.
Craig |
|
We use the QCB upper for our test firing upper for any new rounds/barrels we develop and as such this system has been abused by us in various ways. Two other barrel makers use this system for this exact same reason - it simply cannot be beat. I have personally used it with .45 ACP, .338 Spectre, 7.62 x 25 Tokarev, .30 HRT, 7mm sCAR, .458 SOCOM, 6.8 SPC, 6 x 45, 10mm IAI. We are contemplating at least two offerings that FULLY leverage the advantages of the combination of the MGI upper WITH the modular lower. Tom knows what I mean for one of these ...
Will share pics once the concepts are further along |
|
Marty,
Please do!!!!!!!! I'm very interested in all of your projects. You are doing some very cool stuff! We're very pleased that our MGI QCB upper is making your testing much easier. There's no telling what Marty(the "mad scientist") terWeeme will come up with, now that there is more flexibility in magwell size and shape! |
|
I was in management for over thirty years, and have never seen this level of frank communication by people in the upper levels of a corp. Kudos to MGI et al !!! This is how business' should be run!
|
|
I've always thought the MGI upper was a neat concept, but still needed modifications in the areas of finish and location of rails and levers. However, the new lower that allows drop free AK mag use, and the fact that the MGI uppers are relief cut for this blows me away. I'm going to be keeping my eyes open for this. Fucking incredible.
|
|
So, uh, which half is the receiver/serialized part? |
|
|
Here's an idea that you may have passed up, making a magwell that will for .308 mags and an ar10 upper.....yea.. Use My idea and I want an MGI upper in exchange.. As far as a name, have a contest...mack just seems to lame. Kit isn't a term you want to use in a cool sounding acronym. Modular Caliber Assembly Receiver Universal Magazine Receiver Oh well. I am not feeling creative today. |
|
|
Great idea about the 308 magwell/AR10 upper.
We're contemplating the possibilies of something like that . About the name, Mack Gwinn sort of liked it. We were also considering "Phased Plasma Rifle inthe 40 Watt Range". Or, "Murderous Fire Breathing Bringer of Instant Death". But, we couldn't fit it all onto the receiver. How about, "Variable-Nozzle Bullet Hose"? |
|
Tom,
How about NMRP for a name. Non-monolithic Receiver Platform. Sorry, couldn't resist. One sick and twisted non-MRP happy MGI customer, Craig |
|
Make a magwell that uses unmodified Uzi magazines, and you'll have sold me on it. |
|
|
TWL any ideas when a new handguard system willl be ready yet??? the full length protector that i have on mine is constantly rattling around and "almost" slipping off if it wasnt for the gas block. it just seems that on a finely tuned device like this the handguard extension shouldnt be half assed
Thanks Adam |
|
Adam,
It won't be until next year. We have the design ready, but it is held up at the prototype stage right now. He's informed us that he won't have the prototype ready until after the first of the year. In the meantime, you can drill a small hole and put a small sheet metal screw thru them to hold it in. Admittedly, this has been an issue, and we are working on the resolution. |
|
awesome thanks i really appreciate it. I was also wondering would it be possible to send my current lower to you and have it made into the modular lower. i really like the Rock river and was just wondering thanks Adam
|
|
|
Bangor MAINE!
I've been there. Everybody flies through there with the Army. I never knew I was soo close. That would make one bad ass SBR lower. Finally there will be a use for that folding trigger guard. |
|
I'm running a CQB as my test fire upper now too.
Thanks Marty. I have always thought that the locking levers would be better on top so I can slide my hand back against the mag well. I suppose they would be too close to the rail for some accessories, but then it's the same deal on the bottom if you want a VFG really close to the magwell. Tom- What's the optimum thickness for barrel extension flanges to be used with a CQB? I have run into quite a few barrels that are loose enough to move around by hand when full latched into place on my upper. Does not matter to me as I am only function firing, but I would like to know the right dimension so I can pick through my box of extensions when someone orders a barrel to fit a CQB upper. |
|
Randall,
There is a rather crude but effective adjustment procedure that is built-into the MGI QCB lever system. Give me or Mack a call, and we can walk you thru the procedure. In the meantime, I'll try to get some info on a good average barrel extension flange thickness for you. |
|
Unless those barrels are cheap and out of spec that doesn't sound good.
I'm a huge fan of very tight barrel nut tension as it seems to have a correlation with zero retention. |
|
Quoted:
Unless those barrels are cheap and out of spec...quote] I make all the barrels myself. I use LMT, Rock River and DPMS barrel extensions. My CQB is an early one from what Marty told me when he sold it to me. I'm guessing that my CQB is just a little on the loose side. It would seem pretty simple to tweak the locking arms to make the locks close down further. I have had a few barrels that lock in really good and tight. There is definetely some thickness variation within the makers of barrel extensions. My guess is that all of the extensions are within the spec and that the specs are loose on purpose. In a traditional barrel nut and receiver situation, the thickness variation from barrel to barrel would never matter. It does not bother me one bit that they are loose because I am only using the upper for function firing. I usually don't even have any sights on the uppers. |
|
Right, but other people deffinitely do use sights.
I would hope most of the worst extensions are DPMS. If they are sloppy within the other two companies it would certainly be tough to work a sure-fire approach to get a good fit. |
|
tagged
For the sake of those of us in PRK, can you just run a few hundred (or thousand) with the STAG rollmarks? THANKS!!! |
|
Randall,
While I do not have the specs for MGI, my QCB has been great with a few barrels that run .131ish of an inch on the thickness of the extension flange. This is with a Shaw barrel, a Marty special, a factory Colt and a factory Bushmaster. My Kuehl 22lr barrel had to be whittled down to this .131 dimension as it was 3 or 4 thou over. With this dimension, my levers become snug right at the detent, and it takes a bit of effort to get the levers behind the detent. Its been working great. FWIW, Craig |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.