User Panel
Posted: 8/3/2005 8:32:08 PM EDT
I saw in some gun rag not too long ago about a short barrel AR w/ gain twist rifling. I can't remember the manufactorer or the publication, but the article seemed to list some advantages to it.
Less barrel wear, and most importantly IMO much better velocity-14.5" barrel close to 20" velocity(after all, that seems to be the big debate over to have short barrels or not). Is there a catch? Otherwise, it seems to me that this would be a good answer to have the best of both worlds (short barrel w/ high enough velocity). |
|
That was ARMSTECH's M-4. I wish someone would make chrome lined gain twist polygonal ar barrels. be interesting to see how they perform.
|
|
I dont believe the claims made. If I remeber correctly someone said in acuality they dont produce as much velocity increas as advertised.
|
|
The Noveske uppers are stainless steel with polygonal rifling.
|
|
And some claim the poly rifling here gives a velocity gain. So who's to say AT claims are wrong? BTW, Noveske offers both SS and chrome moly -- his barrels are supplied by PAC NOR. AT needs to get their product out for civilians to try. Lotsa claims made: increased velocity, different SS alloy (not 416R) which has ultra long life and maintains MOA accuracy up into the high thousand round counts (no need for chrome lining), reduced cyclic rate using their gas trap design. I talked to the owner, Joe, several months ago and he said they were pursuing getting their 14" Recon rfile approved for civilian sales -- they would include a permanently attached device to bring the OAL above 16". So far, haven't seen anything. Their website, which is pretty lacking, has remained unchanged for months. I just don't know. Grant maintains he knows a guy who's getting 2700 fps from a SBR Noveske, using BH 77gr. That claim seemed ludicrous, but if he has a chrono to back it up, who am I to say? At the same time another poster tested an AT Compak16 months ago -- velocities achieved fell right in line with other weapons utilizing conventional rifling -- Compak 16 was faster than 9.5" SBRs but was slower than M4s. I can't remember if that was an early version of the COMPAK 16 which used conventional rifling, or if it was a current-production poly, gain twist barrel. The sample sizes out there to evaluate these claims are just too small to make any definitive conclusions. We need more samples. |
|
|
Gain twist rifling died at the end of the first world war. Just too expensive to produce and did not produce any improvements in accuracy over conventional fixed twist rates. It was used primarily in large bore artillery to slowly accelerate the rotation of big shells. It led instead to lots of stripped driving bands.
|
|
I have only read about gaintwist rifling in one new weapon, the S&W .460 revolver. 2200+FPS will be interesting, I handled one last week but it was already sold.
|
|
I recently did some research on the matter for a member who wanted to have a polygonal gain-twist rifled barrel in the ABS carbon-fiber barrel.
I called Pac-Nor, and they have sold their gain-twist tooling. The guy who bought it isn't doing anything with it, and we couldn't get him to let us use it. Pac-Nor's statements on the matter were that maybe a 2% gain in velocity with certain loads might be attainable in an AR with the gain-twist. Not worth the trouble. Polygon rifling is another matter, and may have some benefits due to tight gas seal around the bullet. However, for maximum accuracy work, the 5R rifling and other match-grade cut rifling still seems to dominate the benchrest competitions. Regarding longevity, I haven't personally conducted any tests to see how many rounds can be shot from a polygon-rifled barrel and still remain accurate. However, I will say that the accuracy deterioration generally comes from throat erosion, and it would seem that the rifling type would not have much effect on that activity. Maybe the harder steel would. But hard steel and rifling types are two different subjects. |
|
Regarding gain twist rifling.... couldn't have spelled it better myself. |
|
|
Are you considering polygonal twist for SBR carbon fiber barrels? |
|
|
DevL,
We are currently making a 10.5" SBR barrel in ABS Carbon Fiber process, using the SS Pac-Nor polygon-rifled blank in 1/7 twist, with a suppressor mount. This is for an ARFcom member. It is the same kind of barrel blank that Noveske uses in his barrels. We can use any quality barrel blank with our ABS Carbon Fiber process, however price can vary depending on how much the blank costs, and the turnaround time is increased because it normally takes about 4 weeks to get a barrel blank from Pac-Nor or other barrel makers. This polygon rifled blank option has always been available from us. We've made a few of them, but it hasn't become highly popular yet. Anyone wanting the Pac-Nor polygon barrel done in carbon fiber can have it. In fact, it may not be well known because I haven't advertised this, but ABS is quite happy to make regular(non-carbon fiber process) match grade barrels to order also. ABS is a custom barrel maker, and they can make all kinds of barrels, using whichever type of barrel blank is desired. |
|
What kind of velocity does this barrel produce with BH 77 grain OTM? How about Mk 262? And do you know what it would produce if conventionally rifled? |
|
|
Jmart,
To be honest, I have no chronograph data with these polygon barrels with any type of load. Pad-Nor makes a very nice barrel, but I wouldn't expect anything too far out of the ordinary as far as velocity is concerned from a polygon barrel. My gut feeling is that if you got an extra 100fps out of it, you'd be doing well. I don't think it is going to solve the short barrel/low velocity problem. I think that there are some people doing some wishful thinking out there, who are hoping that it will. The real truth is that a short barrel will reduce muzzle velocity with almost any rifle cartridge. The best you could hope for are minor improvements. The straight answer is to get a longer barrel, if you want more velocity. I know that there is always a hope for some "magic potion" that will solve everyone's problems, but that isn't really going to happen with this short barrel/low velocity issue. I think the answer to the issue lies in bullet design, because that is far more hopeful than getting long barrel velocities out of 10.5" barrels. If the right bullet design came along which could have the correct terminal effects at the low velocities that these short guns produce, then we'd have less of a problem. But, we'd still have the larger amount of bullet drop , and lower energy figures at relatively shorter distances from these short-barrelled guns. So, while I like the Pad-Nor barrels and the polygon rifling just fine, and you may get a small velocity bump, I'm not looking to those things to solve the basic problems that we are facing in the SBR world. Regarding conventional(non-polygon) rifled barrels, you have to remember that there are "fast barrels" and "slow barrels" in the normal barrel world. I've seen what appeared to be identical barrels shoot 100fps different velocities with the same bullet/load. It is really only accurate to say what a particular barrel is doing, because there is quite a bit of variance in what any given barrel will do, compared with another barrel, in terms of velocity. A good gas seal, good chamber fit, and a good fit of the bore to the bullet, and a well-lapped bore will definitely help to improve the velocity results out of any barrel. |
|
What I heard seemed to suggest that the polygonal rifling would impart a significant velocity increase and that the gain twist might even compromise the gas seal of the polygonal rifleing as it is a constantly changeing rifleing pattern.
At any rate 2% additional is not really worth the consideration; if anything the purpose of this would be to limit throat errosion and perhaps change recoil characteristics on some small level. The studies just don't exist- from what I understand it is mostly theoretical at this point. Noveske mentioned 2550FPS from 10.5inch polygonal 1/7's and that sounded like 50-75FPS shy of 14.5inch velocity from std barrels so I'm on board with that. |
|
Austin,
I think you could help us all out when you get your barrel, by chronographing some 77gr stuff, and letting the membership know what velocities you are getting out of the 10.5 polygon Pac-Nor. We're working on getting it to you ASAP. My "seat of the pants" calculations tell me that if the 77gr load will do 2700 out of a 16", it should do about 2500-2550 out of a 10.5. If you add the 100fps from the polygon barrel, that puts it at about 2600 - 2650fps. That's my ballpark estimate for that load in a polygon 10.5'. And, when you consider that this load has only a small velocity margin over fragmentation velocity to start with, a 100fps boost would be significant in extending the fragmentation range, especially with a good BC bullet like the 77gr. So, when you consider that it needs all the help it can get, that extra boost would be valuable to extend frag range from the SBR. I'm not knocking the polygon barrel. I'm just saying that a 10.5" is cutting it pretty slim in the velocity department. |
|
twl, Thanks for giving us your best guess. Don't take this the wrong way, but I am highly skeptical that your poly barrels will achieve 2600 out of a 10.5. I'd be surprised if they hit 2500. Also, I think you lose a lot more velocity than you predict when going down from 16" to 10.5". cbell was the poster back in Feb that posted his test results with AT Compak 16, which is a 10ish" SBR barrel length. Depending on the load, he was almost 400 fps slower compared to a 14.5" M4 barrel. That didn't dovetail at all with AT's claims, but asuming it's true, I can't see how a Pac Nor would be that much slower than an AT barrel seeing as how they employ very similar technology. Even if GT truly resulted in a step backwards, I don't think it would account for that big a loss. I'm really looking fwd to chrono data. All of this up to now is just pure theory and educated guessing. But the chronos don't lie. |
|
|
Jmart,
You may be right. I'm only making crude estimates at best, with my figures above. No claims being made. I don't use anything shorter than 14.5" myself, and I find myself leaving the 14.5" in the case more and more now, in favor of using my 16". Again, there are always "fast barrels" and "slow barrels" no matter what you do. If you get a slow barrel, then even if the rifling did make a difference, you might never know it. If you get a fast barrel, then you might think the rifling did alot more than it really was doing. I'd say again that it only matters what any one particular barrel will do, and that's the one you are using at the time. |
|
I started some 7.62 and 5.56 Polygonal Gain Twist testing a while back.
When the twist rate starts at 1 in 35, the bullet enters a throat with almost straight lands. As the rate of twist increases to 1 in 7, the lands push the forward portion of the bullet's grooves over to one side. When recovering fired rounds, the groove on the bullet is triangular, wider on the front than the base. This is a swage on the diameter of the bullet rather than an inward swage from the initial lead in the throat. Whether this creates a problem or not is still uncertain. In 2000 A.D., I built a 7.62 bolt gun, 24" SS Poly gain twist, 1 in 50 to 1 in 10 in 20". It shot very well. The side swage issue got my attention, and I attempted to aquire some driving band bullets in 22 and 30 cal, something like the Barnes 50 BMG solids. The bullets never were made, and we went on to other things. I have two 30 cal 50-10 in 20" Gain Twist SS Polygonal barrels. I just finished one into a 22" AR-10 barrel for a friend. As soon as Armalite gets the upper receivers finished, we'll be testing it. I built two AR-10 16" lightweights with 50-10 in 12" gains. I have them both here, and will do some chrono testing this week. Gain twist is very interesting. As for the 10.5" Poly 7 twist, a friend ran some chrono testing. Please note that these results were shot back to back, so a total of 10 shots per ammo type, to ensure that there was no error & that the readings were consistent. These are the results of the final series of 5 shots per ammo type: PLATFORM: M4 w/ Noveske 10.5” Polygonal (1:7 twist) Lake City XM193 55gr 2528 2887 2821 2665 2539 AVERAGE: 2688 FPS Lake City M855 62gr 2650 2405 2641 2533 2563 AVERAGE: 2558.4 FPS Black Hills MK 262 77gr: 2291 2331 2418 2441 2401 AVERAGE: 2376.4 FPS Hornady TAP NATO 75gr: 2569 2559 2541 2548 2533 AVERAGE: 2550 FPS ----John Noveske |
|
the reg cut bbl will be more accurate than the poly cut bbl correct?
|
|
found this artical thought some people might be interested.
"Subject: Re: polygonal rifling From: Gale McMillan <" gale"@mcmfamily.com> Date: Apr 23 1997 Newsgroups: rec.guns Barry S Brummett wrote: # What does "polygonal rifling" mean? How is it different from other # kinds? Is it a process or a pattern or what? Thanks in advance. Instead of the rifling being square and hanging down in the bore so that it can engrave a square notch in the bullet it has flats where the rifling would be. The bullet is not upset much. Instead of having 6 or 8 sharp knotches it will have small flats that are very unnoticeable. This makes the bullet fly better in the wind because there is no sharp edges to bite into a cross wind. The bullet jacket is not deformed as much so the chances of loose cores are much less. Since there is no sharp corners to burn off the barrel life is much longer and is dependent on heat checking alone to end its life. That is one major reason most barrel makers are not interested in them. It would decrease their business by half. They are more difficult to make than regular rifled barrels for a couple of reasons one being they are difficult to lap and give a cut barrel maker more problems due to tooling." Gale McMillan |
|
Just got some chrono data on the 16" Gain Twist Poly AR-10. The barrel is 1 in 50 to 1 in 10". We were short on time and only fired 5 rounds through it. The barrel had an OPS INC brake on it. I guess it works, but..... I like quiet rifles.
08-30-05 75 F' 1000 ft elev appx 10 ft between chrono and rifles M118 LR AR-10 16" polygonal gain twist 50-10 SS w/ OPS INC brake 2507 2586 2552 2551 2505 average 2540 We shot some other rifles, here is the data. This test was not perfect. It was quick. The chrono was a side note to the Function test on the 10.5" 6.8mm. M118 LR AR-10 22" 10P SS Smith Vortex same conditions as above 2704 2693 2711 2675 2688 average 2690 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.8mm SPC Green Box Remington 10.5" 10P SS W/ KFH 2348 2298 2344 2351 2319 avg 2330 W/ AAC M47-2000 2424 2400 2376 2390 2366 avg 2390 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform 5.56 NMm0 10.5" 7P SS all with US KFH ammo: MK-262 M1 2480 2466 2474 2448 2455 avg 2460 ammo: HDY TAP 75gr NATO 2502 2435 2496 2510 2504 avg 2490 ammo: British NATO SS-109 RORG 89 2697 2633 2617 2681 2658 avg 2660 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.56 NMm0 14.5" AFGHAN 7T 3L SS W/ AAC M47-2000 (left the M4-2000 at the shop) 2887 2935 2943 2911 2975 avg 2930 Thanks, ----John |
|
I have wanted to work with gain twist barrels for some time, I think there could be some pretty amazing results with regard to velocity, accuracy and pressure.
Polygonal rifle does improve velocity and reduces pressure slightly. What about squeeze bore technology? |
|
Not sure if anybody is doing anything with it now, but the Germans did that in WWII with the 20mm APCR collapsible driving band projo. It had a tungsten carbide core. The carbide dried up and the production stopped. It has been about 10 years since I read about. I think it was gain twist also. It is on my book shelf, somewhere.....
|
|
Very short barrels and superlative internal ballistics, two benefits of squeeze bore technology.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.