User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/23/2004 4:38:18 PM EDT
The single chamber military brake being used on the SPR. I was about 20' away when I took the pic. It was a bitch to get the pic with an old digital camera. Movie wouldnt work either. Frame rate must be too slow as the sound comes through, but no flash. Ran through 2 mags before I was able to get a decent picture.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2004 4:47:34 PM EDT
[#1]
if that's actual size I'd say it works pretty well
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2004 4:54:34 PM EDT
[#2]
Bigbore,
I think the threads on the OPS brake will still keep it a no-no for us in states with State AWBs. Any word on ATF approval of your ADCO clone brake? I know that lots of us ARFcommers in the affected states (NJ,NY, CT, etc) are eager to use it if /when we can... Will |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2004 5:05:13 PM EDT
[#3]
The ADCO brake is on the way to the scrap heap. Thie will be a new impoved version from another source with a real thread protector last week. As an option, the thread protector can be blind pinned in place - I'll see about sending that for BATF approval, but its not mine to send.... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2004 5:45:26 PM EDT
[#4]
Sounds great...can you give us the details on the new brake?
Will |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/23/2004 5:55:02 PM EDT
[#5]
Same as the real thing but without the patented baffle(that you cant see unless you know what to look for). I should have more soon. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2004 3:51:36 AM EDT
[#6]
Bigbore,
put me down for the new brake.Thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2004 10:41:57 AM EDT
[#7]
Is the new brake worth upgrading to?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2004 10:55:59 AM EDT
[#8]
If its not broke, dont fix it
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2004 11:45:16 AM EDT
[#9]
Duly noted.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2004 1:28:43 PM EDT
[#10]
For the States with their own AWB which may prohibit flash suppressors, it is up to them to define flash sppressors based on their own standards: the ATF only determines the federal standard for the Federal AWB, however Federal legislation supercedes State legislation if more prohibitive than the sates When the Federal AWB sunsets, the states that have their own version determine what is and isn't postban legal in conjunction with their laws |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/24/2004 4:32:28 PM EDT
[#11]
Interesting info, Alan. Does anyone know where I could get more info/clarification on the details of the state AWBs, or guidance on legality? I've looked around quite a bit have never seen where/how my state (NJ) defines a FS. Maybe it hasn't yet, but now will have to, with the Federal AWB sunset? This stuff is really confusing, and of course, is most likely designed that way on purpose to scare folks away from accessorizing their post-ban legal AR-type rifles (if they're even willing to go through the hassle of getting one in the first place)! Thanks for any help here. Will |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
