Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 7/22/2003 7:28:17 AM EDT
While playing with my AR, I noticed that the tail on the disconnector is what prevents the safety from being placed on when the hammer is down.  I was wondering if anyone knew the reasoning behind this design decision - was it something mandated by the military?  Does the tail of the disconnector serve some purpose other than blocking the safety with the hammer down?
Link Posted: 7/22/2003 12:41:36 PM EDT
[#1]
No, it's actually the trigger body itself that prevents the safety from being engaged when the hammer is down.

The tail of the disconnector is engaged by a full auto selector in the M16 to provide fully automatic fire.  Standard semi-auto disconnectors have a chopped-down tail, compared to the full auto part.
Link Posted: 7/22/2003 4:06:51 PM EDT
[#2]
Damn, sorry for the brain fart, I swear I meant to say trigger body.
Link Posted: 7/22/2003 5:13:44 PM EDT
[#3]
If the hammer could be cocked with the safety engaged then the hammer could be released with the safety engaged.

Not a good thing.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top