"...Please forgive me but what does Eugene Stoner have to do with the KAC rifles?..."[/quote]
Before he died in 1997, Mr. Stoner was a member of our (Knight's) R&D and engineering staff. For example, the 7.62mm SR-25 had been one of his dreams for many years, as he had originally designed the 7.62mm AR-10 and 5.56mm M16 family of weapons more than 30 years prior. His association with us at Knight's in the early 90's produced that "SR-25" rifle, which has now matured into the Navy SEAL Mk11 Mod 0 Sniper Rifle System. Note also that the basic rifle (100's of them) from this package is also issued to elite US Army units as well, its just not marked Mk11 Mod 0.
Our SR-15 (the 15 designating 5.56mm cal. in a semi-only gun) Match rifle was another of his ideas, sort of a "smaller SR-25". That is why the first ones had the same black fiberglass handguard of the SR-25. So our (Knight's) entry into the 5.56 commercial market had the advantage of having the original designer/inventor of the 5.56mm M16 system at the helm. I mean one of the reasons Colt used to build the best AR's was that Mr. Stoner helped educate them back in the Viet-Nam era.
All of your other makers of AR's today are making "copies" based on their "reverse engineering" or using Colt or Government drawings to duplicate their parts. Well let me tell you, "it ain't all on the blueprints". You have to understand how everything works together--not just the parts themselves--but the tolerances and how they "stack".
During Viet-Nam, Colt learned the "sweet zones" in the tolerance ranges that the prints don't provide. So they were able to produce thousands of functional rifles per week. When the Army provided the update M16A2 blueprint package to FN for the M16A2's to be built in South Carolina back in 1988 or so, those guns initially produced did not function well at all. In fact they failed First Article at Aberdeen Proving Ground. Then they had a problem with the trigger that allowed the gun to fire "upon release of the trigger", even though all the parts were proven to meet their blueprint requirements.
So if a world class gun company like FN had a problem producing M16 part sets that functioned well together, how well do smaller company's do it?
So you might say "Knight's had it easy because Mr. Stoner helped them", well duh...we were the only company in the later 20th century that did have his expertise! I mean why do you think Colt is having so amny problems over the last 10 years? Well, all the original crew (like Mr. Rob Roy) are in small arms heaven popping caps on the firing line alongside Mr. Stoner.
ColdBlue sends...