Quoted:
i personally dislike the HK-style sights for the exact reason you mention. my eye tends to line up the rear sight coincidental to the front sight *hood*. i end up with my elevation wwwaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyy off because the tip of the front sight post is not necessarily at the center of the sight hood.
Doesn't that mean that you adjusted it the same way a traditional sight is set, though? Like, you set the front post to be correct when vertically centered in the rear aperture without regard for the front hood, but are getting messed up because you naturally center the front hood anyway when actually shooting, right? If you adjusted it with the front hood aligned, your post would be a bit high (or low) relative to center of the circle, but your point of aim would be correctly on top of it if I'm not mistaken.
Quoted:
You haven't accurately drawn the standard sight either. On each side, there are the curved edges which give another vertical point of reference.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2170/1548346964_b45d132841.jpg?v=0
As you can see, it's not just simply a post in the middle. Those curved edges give reference points for centering. The image I found online looks to be out of alignment a little. the front sight needs to move to the left a little.
I don't think I agree with this. I left off the "ears" in my drawing because I was told they're irrelevant to the post in aperture sight picture. I agree they give horizontal reference, but so does the HK style. And if you're saying they give vertical reference, it's not a constant one because my post may be higher or lower in relation to the ears than yours.
I'm not trying to argue for this, just to understand why HK might not be the way to go. I bought mine because I needed a front folding sight and that's what was available. If the normal type was in stock at the time, that's what I would have bought because it's what I've used before. While I only have a couple hundred rounds using the HK style, I've liked it so far. I'm just trying to get the whole picture (ha) so that I don't get accustomed to something that's not the best answer in the long run.
Is the knock against it that, while lined up correctly with the post, having your point of impact not in the center of your aperture is a problem?