User Panel
Posted: 2/25/2009 1:10:18 PM EDT
Wondering why I haven't heard much about this on the forums. It's exactly what I've been hoping for... Thank You HK!
MR 556 - Civilian Version of HK416 MR556 RIFLE A direct descendent of the HK416, the MR556 is a semi-automatic rifle developed by Heckler & Koch as a premium level commercial/civilian firearm. Like the HK416, the MR556 is a major product improvement of conventional AR-type carbines and rifles. Using the HK-proprietary gas piston system found on the HK416 and G36, the MR556 does not introduce propellant gases and carbon fouling back into the rifle's interior, making it the most reliable of any AR-type firearm. The MR556 will be produced at Heckler & Koch's new manufacturing facility at Newington, New Hampshire from American and German made components. To conform to German export regulations, certain design changes made in the MR556 prevents the rifle's upper receiver from being used on other AR-style firearms. The MR556 uses many of the assemblies and accessories originally developed for the HK416 series arms including the HK free-floating fourquadrant rail system/handguard. This system allows all current accessories, sights, lights, and aimers used on M4/M16-type weapons to be fitted to the MR556. The HK rail system can be installed and removed without tools and returns to zero when reinstalled. Like the famous HK416, the MR556 uses a barrel produced by Heckler & Koch's famous cold hammer forging process. The highest quality steel is used in this unique manufacturing process producing a barrel that provides superior accuracy for more than 20,000 rounds with minimal degradation of accuracy and muzzle velocity. Projected availability of the MR556 in the USA is late 2009. |
|
Quoted:
I'm not into the proprietary upper. agreed 100% they had me until that particular bit... |
|
Quoted:
It is nice to see a LWRC clone. Yeah, because LWRC made piston ARs before HK....not. |
|
Quoted:
It is nice to see a LWRC clone. Don't get out much do ya? |
|
And you think post-election prices are bad? Imagine what the price for that rifle will be if it's ever actually released here. I'm glad HKs have no appeal to me.
ETA: I almost forgot. jcrowl will buy it! |
|
I wonder if you'll have to have a credit score of 720 to get financed to buy one?
My D.I. ARs will serve me just fine. |
|
"certain design changes made in the MR556 prevents the rifle's upper receiver from being used on other AR-style firearms:\"
Pass. |
|
Quoted:
HK, because you suck and we hate you! You are correct sir. HK can pound it up their ass sideways. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
It is nice to see a LWRC clone. Yeah, because LWRC made piston ARs before HK....not. Yes the M6A1 and M6A2 came out before the MR556. My LWRC is real. I can touch it, smell it, shoot it. To me the HK is make believe. |
|
I wonder if there are any compromises in the design
Meh, I would pick one up but betcha its double the cost of a MRP CQBPS16 |
|
By the time you can actually buy one of these they will probably be illegal to own.
Nice goin' HK, you should have produced the 416 while you could. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It is nice to see a LWRC clone. Yeah, because LWRC made piston ARs before HK....not. Yes the M6A1 and M6A2 came out before the MR556. My LWRC is real. I can touch it, smell it, shoot it. To me the HK is make believe. The development of the LWRC was spurred by the development of the HK416. |
|
Quoted:
I wonder if you'll have to have a credit score of 720 to get financed to buy one? My D.I. ARs will serve me just fine. Ask Obama for some bailout money to get one! |
|
Quoted:
Buy the time you can actually buy one of these they will probably be illegal to own. Nice goin' HK, you should have produced the 416 while you could. and made it compatable with every AR in existance as far as parts.......you cant even fit the stupid upper on a standard AR lower HK=FAIL |
|
Quoted:
The development of the LWRC was spurred by the development of the HK416. There were concept pistons AR way before the HK416. Why does HK get all the credit and love? |
|
Ugh, here we go again... same bat time, same bat channel...err forum.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The development of the LWRC was spurred by the development of the HK416. There were concept pistons AR way before the HK416. Why does HK get all the credit and love? Sure, others came before, and failed. But this recent wave of piston rifles and conversions came after the (success of the) HK416. |
|
I'd take an LMT piston gun over that HK in a heartbeat. No contest. LMT has it beat hands down. |
|
Quoted:
I'd take an LMT piston gun over that HK in a heartbeat.
No contest. LMT has it beat hands down. By what measure? If this thing is identical to the Hk416 in regards to reliability and function, it has every gas piston beat. I realize it's the in thing to hate HK, but the HK416 is a superior weapon to the LWRC and LMT. |
|
A few people here need to read on what Dr. Roberts has posted about his testing with the piston guns, from what I read the HK has performed best of all. That may have changed recently but that was back in Mid Spring 2008 when I read this.
|
|
"certain design changes made in the MR556 prevents the rifle's upper receiver from being used on other AR-style firearms:\"
I'm not surprised at all about the upper being only used on HK's lower. Its all about making money. If you had the choice of purchasing a HK 416 upper, or purchasing the whole weapon and spending about another $800.00. Its easy to see what would sell faster. With HK its about profit margins and not so much about putting out the best product at the best price. If you think about it the big companies such as HK, Colt, FN, and others make most of there money by selling to military and police. The civilian market is sometimes hit and miss.That's just my opinion. |
|
Look, few of us are fighting in the sandbox, so whatever supposed advantage you get from the 416, is completely lost in having no parts supply should something go wrong; and since it's a fairly new design, you can count on something going wrong. And if by chance you need parts, you get to deal with H&K's notorious, oh, you're not a major military or LE agency, so it just sucks to be you, customer service.
Take care of your AR and it will take care of you, simple as that. Do that and it will work in the Middle East, so we should have no problems (and really few excuses) with functioning here in the US. The AR/M16 is thoroughly military tested and although not perfect, it works pretty damn well. Maybe it's just me, but if I'm going to stake my life on something, I tend to stake it on the Devil I know. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd take an LMT piston gun over that HK in a heartbeat.
No contest. LMT has it beat hands down. By what measure? If this thing is identical to the Hk416 in regards to reliability and function, it has every gas piston beat. I realize it's the in thing to hate HK, but the HK416 is a superior weapon to the LWRC and LMT. A) I don't hate HK. B) You better be prepared to qualify your "the HK416 is a superior weapon to the LWRC and LMT" statement if you're going to claim that. C) LMT is made in the States, has highly interchangable parts within the AR world, HK absolutely does not. LMT's piston system is by no means inferior to HK's and frankly offers access, simplicity and ease of use easily on par with HK. HK charges ridiculous premiums on a product that is of no better quality. Why don't you tell me what HK has on LMT? Before you answer, educate yourself here..... REMOVED, no linking to sites hostile to this one, ARFCOM staff rules not mine~Cold Copy and paste relevant text for those that need it instead! It is good info. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd take an LMT piston gun over that HK in a heartbeat.
No contest. LMT has it beat hands down. By what measure? If this thing is identical to the Hk416 in regards to reliability and function, it has every gas piston beat. I realize it's the in thing to hate HK, but the HK416 is a superior weapon to the LWRC and LMT. A) I don't hate HK. B) LMT is made in the States, has highly interchangable parts within the AR world, HK absolutely does not. LMT's piston system is by no means inferior to HK's and frankly offers access, simplicity and ease of use easily on par with HK. HK charges ridiculous premiums on a product that is of no better quality. Why don't you tell me what HK has on LMT? Before you answer, educate yourself here..... REMOVED, no linking to sites hostile to this one, ARFCOM staff rules not mine~Cold Copy and paste relevant text for those that need it instead! It is good info. Like Cold said, the system faired better than all other systems when tested. I'll take the more reliable system combined with HK quality. To me, this doesn't have to be compatiable with other systems. That's not important at all to me. |
|
I'm not saying LMT and LWRC or the Rec-7 since it too is piston, did not fare well, the HK, last I checked from a reputable source (versus us unknowns on the net) said the HK was showing best overall. That again is dated info and may not be the most up to date.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd take an LMT piston gun over that HK in a heartbeat.
No contest. LMT has it beat hands down. By what measure? If this thing is identical to the Hk416 in regards to reliability and function, it has every gas piston beat. I realize it's the in thing to hate HK, but the HK416 is a superior weapon to the LWRC and LMT. A) I don't hate HK. B) LMT is made in the States, has highly interchangable parts within the AR world, HK absolutely does not. LMT's piston system is by no means inferior to HK's and frankly offers access, simplicity and ease of use easily on par with HK. HK charges ridiculous premiums on a product that is of no better quality. Why don't you tell me what HK has on LMT? Before you answer, educate yourself here..... REMOVED, no linking to sites hostile to this one, ARFCOM staff rules not mine~Cold Copy and paste relevant text for those that need it instead! It is good info. Like Cold said, the system faired better than all other systems when tested. I'll take the more reliable system combined with HK quality. To me, this doesn't have to be compatiable with other systems. That's not important at all to me. I didn't ask Cold, I asked you. You said it, you claimed it...back it up. |
|
REMOVED, no linking to sites hostile to this one, ARFCOM staff rules not mine~Cold Copy and paste relevant text for those that need it instead! It is good info. |
|
Text from "verboten" site
Credit goes to SMGlee "Following the success of British SA80A2 project that HK did for British MoD, HK carry that momentum to the M16 platform as the next logical choice. As soon as the HK 416 hit the military market, been a favorite combat platform for the elite of the elites, and a much desired weapon in the US civilian market with street prices that reached the astronomical 5000.00 for a complete barreled piston upper, HK recoil buffer and buffer spring. While due to some political restrains, HK was unable to sell the HK 416 on the US soil for the civilian market, it created a void for others to follow. First into the fold was LWRC, which has been one of the few successful piston systems that can match directly against the HK 416 system in turns of performance and durability. Later POF join the fray and soon a salute of cottage industry risen to fill the new piston craze. From drop in system to conversion, so far only LWRC, POF and newcomer PWS has proven to be a viable system. This year LMT pushed out their long under development piston system based the MRP (Monolithic rail platform). LMT has had a piston system from as far back as the SCAR solicitation, but due to production schedule/availability, timing and LMT ‘s desire to come out with a system to topple the rest, resulted in the delivery of the system until now. The standard direct gas MRP has been the Ferrari of all M4/M16 platforms with features such as quick change barrel, solid one piece rail platform, and now a piston system. Most of the piston system on the market including the HK 416 has a much different recoil impulse than the direct gas guns, the felt recoil is more of a sharper jolt. The HK 416 recoil impulse is not as smooth nor is it as soft as the direct gas guns, but for reliability, there is no matching the capability of the HK. LMT MRP in another hand, it is about as smooth and as soft recoiling as the direct gas gun, in comparison to the HK 416, the LMT piston system are far more like the recoil of the direct gas guns than anything I have shot recently, including the LWRC, POF, and PWS. We set up the LMT piston system with just the basic, EOTech 556, Midwest Industry flip front and rear SPLP sight, TangoDown rail panels and vertical grip. The host lower has a H2 buffer with standard recoil spring. All testing was shot using the latest in magazine technology, the new TangoDown ARC polymer magazine. The accuracy of the piston MRP is also on par to the hammer forged barrel on the HK 416. We shot prone from 100 yards, the scoped used was a Leupold MR/T 2-8X36 with illuminated mil-dot mounted to a American Defense Manufacturing 30mm quick detachable mount. Both guns shooting a 1-2MOA group with Hornady 75GR TAP, about 2-3 MOA with Lake City M855 and also M193. We also ran Wolf but that ammo was more for reliability testing than actual accuracy. The numbers posted by the LMT MRP are on par with any combat carbine currently fielding. I believe if I used a match trigger for the testing, the accuracy results would be slightly better. As far as reliability, the HK has proven itself time and time again on the battlefield; can the LMT match its pace? As HK are already a proven system, we concentrated on the MRP piston. We shot 500 rounds of wolf, 500 rounds of M193 and also 500 rounds of M855 plus a saluted of reloads and factory ammo from various shooters at the training session that day. The total round count came to approximately 2000 rounds during the day. The LMT piston worked flawlessly. And the internals only took a simple wipe down to get it clean. However due to Wolf ammo, we had to scrub the throat, chamber and also the bolt head to get rid of the red sealant common on the Wolf ammo. HK 416 utilize a lot of proprietary components, from barrel, barrel nut, bolt, bolt carrier, to firing pin, none of this is interchangeable with the Direct gas guns, and you would have to run the HK buffer and spring in order to keep the recoil impulse in check. But with the MRP you actually have a few more common parts to the DI gas gun than the HK, you can still run the standard bolt and firing pins inside the MRP which are some of the more commonly replaced parts in the AR system. With the HK, you would pay a high price for the armor’s tool just to remove the barrel, with the LMT, two torque screws which keep the barrel secured in the monolithic rail platform. For those of us that are not on a government budget, the MRP is definitely a lot easier to service than the HK 416. HK piston is a top loading system, although the rail system on the HK 416 is supposed to return to zero, a lot of operators I spoke with never like to remove the rail to clean the piston since re-zeroing the PEQ15 are very time consuming task. LMT MRP is a front loading system; all parts are easily accessed by removing the front gas regulator plug, so you do not have to remove the rail system to access the piston. Also the plus is adjustable for standard fire and suppressed fire; this is a major plus for those that run suppressed guns. We had the opportunity to shoot both system with the excellent AAC M4-2000 and the result was interesting. With a suppressed piston system, it is naturally much louder than a suppressed DI gas gun due to the gas regulator releasing excess gas. The LMT MRP shot slightly quieter than the HK 416. We measured with a studio quality sound meter placed at the shooter’s left ear. The HK piston system shot approximately 1.5dB higher than a DI gas gun, but with the LMT the sound suppression came within 1 dB of the DI gas gun. Both guns ran higher cyclic rate when suppressed, but it was still slower than a Colt M4 suppressed. LMT MRP piston system, it is on par with the weight of the HK 416, which is heavy compare to a Direct Gas M4, but you give up in turns of weight to gain the ultimate reliability in an AR system. But With the LMT MRP piston system, you have a platform (so far) that is just as reliable as the HK 416, but at half of the cost (street price LMT at 1400.00 vs. 4000.00 for the HK 416), less recoil, softer shooting platform with slightly more common parts than the HK 416. Only remaining question is how reliable is the piston system design? This will require more than just the 2000 rounds I shot in a day, I will have to keep this gem and run a lot more rounds through it. I plan on taking this gun with me to Larry Vicker’s carbine class in South Hill, Virginia in a month time." I wish I could host all the photos, but this is a good read. |
|
Thanks Cold. I have been telling people here about that link, but I'm glad you posted the quote from SMGLee. I am looking forward to more of his testing of the LMT...especially when he gets back from Larry Vickers class. Hopefully he will share what Larry might have to say about the LMT also.
I know I really like mine. I could have had any other piston (except HK), but I chose LMT because of their versatility. Thanks again. When SMGLee posts more information over on the 'other' site, I will be glad to copy and paste it here if you like. |
|
You can already buy MR223s in Canada. Same rifle but all German made. $4200 CAN seems high but even a LMT piston is $2800 CAN new here.
|
|
Quoted:
"certain design changes made in the MR556 prevents the rifle's upper receiver from being used on other AR-style firearms:\" Pass. ^^^ This. A day late and a dollar or so short HK. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd take an LMT piston gun over that HK in a heartbeat.
No contest. LMT has it beat hands down. By what measure? If this thing is identical to the Hk416 in regards to reliability and function, it has every gas piston beat. I realize it's the in thing to hate HK, but the HK416 is a superior weapon to the LWRC and LMT. I AM NOT A PISTON FAN(and after having to fix an LMT buis myself with a damn dremmel, not much of a fan of LMT either at the moment) but, playing devil's advocate I can think of a few things I like better with the LMT piston: 1)Standard height upper receiver More choices of iron sights, mounts, and depending on your pickiness, maybe even optics. 2)Monolithic upper and rail Your rail may bolt/screw/snap/QD into place but nothin beats being machined out of the same one-piece forging. 3)Piston assembly is easily removable without removing anything else Right out the front is kinda slick. The two big advantages I see the Hk having over the LMT 2) It has already beaten the real M4 in government tests It makes me feel kinda gritty to say that, but there it is. 3) It's made by Hk Love it or hate it, Kool-aid or whatever, that will help sales. Tex78 |
|
whoop pee doo
i don't see anything about the LWRC M6A3, the greastest piston AR of all time. |
|
+1 George
HK sent a team of secret agents to try to duplicate the LWRC design. Very few people know this( my ninja clan has been observing HK for a while).They did a pretty good job. HK IMHO has been spotty on a couple of guns I have personally spent time with. A good friend bought an unfired HK91 and we played hell trying to make it function properly. HK customer service is like the Le Car...(hard to find). I will take an MP5 though if one of you will let one go sub $1500. Actually I'll take a few at that price. Transferrable FA would be nice. |
|
This will become the standard patrol rifle after it is released. gear-gueer cops and police cheifs will spend $4000 per rifle at taxpayer expense because the Goatbang County Sheriffs office SWAT team needs the absolute best in case there is an active shooter situation at the Circle-K. Even better if these rediculous and unnecessary SWAT teams get federal funding for their new HK toys. I can see it now... State University campus bike cops with HK416s.
HK....Helping keep us safe from ourselves. |
|
I was into piston guns before piston guns were cool! (Rhino Gas system)
If I go piston again, I'll go with LWRCI btw: I own 5 HK's |
|
For my part Hk has never impressed me.
The pistols suck erganomicly unless you have the hands of Shaq. The SL8's reciever would fracture on every single gun though many owners never noticed probably mostly because theirs never left the safe. The XM8 also had a problem with major breakages in the SCAR trials which lost them the contest. My brother actually had a g36 sighting system for use on an SL-8. It was the worst piece of junk sight I ever saw. The optics were dark, had terrible clarity, and less field of view than I ever imagined possible. He listed it on gunbroker the day he got it. My buddies G3 is unreliable, dirty, and generally feels like a giant slow moving dinosaur. If the nasty, filthy, brass mangling chamber of that gun is not an example of half assed jerry rigged engineering I don't know what is. Perhaps I have been alone in my personal experiences and perhaps I have been misinformed but for my part I just find the company's products not so special. Add that to the fact they go out of their way to be a pain in the ass to civilians on top of charging a fortune. I maintain the only reason people love them so much is that their stuff costs a fortune and is so unavailable that most folks have never used it. Basically I agree that: HK can pound it up their ass sideways.
If I wanted a piston gun incompatible with the AR platform I would by the SCAR. It is cheaper, more reliable (at least according to the SCAR trial), can be folded for transport, has an adjustable cheek weld, and has a detachable barrel. |
|
Quoted:
The pistols suck erganomicly unless you have the hands of Shaq. They're roughly the same as Sig and Glock. So, maybe this is your problem. Quoted:
My buddies G3 is unreliable, dirty, and generally feels like a giant slow moving dinosaur. If the nasty, filthy, brass mangling chamber of that gun is not an example of half assed jerry rigged engineering I don't know what is. Your buddy's rifle can't be a genuine HK. It's probably a kit gun. The HK91 is arguably the most reliable 7.62 nato rifle ever made. It is much more reliable than even an AR15. |
|
not going to hate on the HK its a nice rifle, but imma stick with my LWRC
|
|
|
This is going to make the 3000$ Magpul lower look cheap. You won't be able to afford bullets, but at least you can drown your enemies in cool-aid!
|
|
+1 LMT or POF piston systems. Heck bushmaster makes piston systems now. Not exactly HK quality but at least they are mil-spec and interchangeable with AR lowers and parts. I respect HK for the fine military firearms they produce but passed on their realistic availability in the US civilian market.
|
|
Quoted:
This is going to make the 3000$ Magpul lower look cheap. You won't be able to afford bullets, but at least you can drown your enemies in cool-aid! lol, good point. but I live for kool-aid... |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.