I wasn't aware it was for SF use. The forward assist was developed at the time the M16 was being fielded - with the wrong powder, no chrome plating, no cleaning kits, and new users unfamiliar with a radically new operating concept. So the Army wouldn't even accept the weapon until it was in A1 configuration to remedy the other problems that eventually were eliminated.
As for needing silent loading, operationally, not. Soldiers don't leave the wire unless they are locked and loaded. It's a prime ambush site in itself, and all the noisy operation of loading a firearm can be done before hand. If you're in the box - with no barrier wall and exposed to enemy fire - you don't go unloaded. You have to have immediate response to action there too.
Wandering around unloaded in a combat area is not what I was taught. For me, the FA is a bandaid covering up the incompetent fielding of the M16 more than anything.
As it has been around for decades and actually comes with an upper for less than without, it's economically justified. Quiet loading around family, etc, does have a place - although the actual firing when needed will certainly be more shocking.
Remediating a stoppage in combat is often the justification for keeping the FA. The problems are friction that consumes the available energy of the BCG closing, and magazines that fail to properly control the cartridge. Friction can be from difficult extraction, the BCG sliding in the upper, a extension with insufficient porting that slows the buffer, and/or deficiency in gas pushing the cartridge against the bolt face. Light weigt aluminum magazines with easily dented feed lips aren't one of the M16's known strong points, something the AK-47 owners will be happy to fully explain. Kalasnikov designed a goof proof magazine and fitted a rifle to it, not vice versa.
We're advised to run AR's wet with lube - and that's a giveaway. Coated BCG's with dry film lubricants are tested and on the market. We've already fixed the propellant, and know to keep the buffer tube opened up to breath. Magazines like the PMags seem to do a much better job and are more durable.
With 45 years development and the use of even more modern improvements, I think it's time to retire the forward assist as the anachronistic and unecessary answer to a problem that shouldn't be allowed to exist.