Quoted: i think people buy the ar's for the looks.. they look awesome! however, i have heard this and know from personal experience with the AK47s... they are tough as nails.. but i just dont get the hype of the AR15 that everyone seems to have.. everyone passes up ak47s and goes for the ar15s... i want one and all but i wouldnt give up an AK47 for one.. i was just wanting to get yalls opinions on the matter. thanks to all those who took the time to respond! god bless you all
|
In the spirit of AR15.com, I actually have "both".
A couple of MAK-90s and a few AR-15s. The only AK clones I would consider on the market today are converted Saigas or Arsenal brands. Sorry, but I can't see myself purchasing a Romy kit gun put together with some substandard receiver here in the US.
As for reliability, my Bushmaster has been just as reliable as either one of my MAK-90s. I had one J&T upper that was great, and one that had to be replaced under warranty due to an out of spec gas tube. Also, one of these days, I will have a POF piston AR-15 upper and I plan to test the hell out of it for "reliability"
.
In a SHTF situation, I would trust my life to what ever gun I happen to have in my hands because each one has its particular use. If I have to travel out into the elements (water, mud, etc.) I plan on having a MAK-90 handy as well as my Glock 21. If I am going to bunker down in my house, I will have a 16" AR-15 with a telestock and either a Glock 21, S&W 1911PD, or Sig Sauer P226 (or all three handguns
) as well as the Remington 870 with 00 buck handy. Heck, I even have rifles for long range sniper type work, but I already told you too much!
The postitive things about the AR-15 are:
1. Accuracy
2. The ability to carry a lot of ammo without being bogged down due to weight
The positive points about the AK style weapon are:
1. Utmost reliability
2. Ultra simple to use and maintain with a smaller number of parts than the AR
The jist of my long drawn out point is that ARs and AKs both have there place. That is just my .02.