I see replies touting Lasik. I considered it until I learned when my wife had hers, that it almost ALWAY ends up requiring the patient to use reading glasses. This means that objects (like sights???) are too close to see clearly. Good shooting technique requires that the shooter focus on the sights rather than the target, so to me, that means shooting AFTER Lasik would be iffy unless dones especially with shooting in mind, as one contributor did. That means doing one eye for distance and one for close work. I'm just not sure I want to deal with the difficulty of having nearsightedness in one eye and farsightedness in the other. Hey, wait. That's my problem now.
As I mentioned, my wife had Lasik surgery, and loves the distance imnprovement, from 20/400 to 20/15. But she can't see close-up unless she uses reading glasses, which as a teacher, requires her to be constantly putting them on and off. So, while she IS pleased with the results, they are not without some disadavantages that everyone must consider for themselves.
The way *I* have solved my problem is that I use Trijicon Reflex sights on ALL of my rifles. They are good out to 350 yards and more, and despite the size of the reticle, I can still make pinpoint shots with them. Now I don't have to worry about focusing on three different planes. I just put the dot where I want the bullet to strike, and it goes there, sometimes using a slight holdover at longer ranges.
As usual, YMMV