Thank you for your replies.
As to the rest of the carbine, I'm going to get it with the Stubby stock, A3 upper (for more future flexibility), and a muzzle brake. It has to be a "Post Ban" permanent brake added onto a 14.5" barrel. I'm leaning toward the Y-comp; but what about Bushmaster's "AK" brake? How do they differ and compare especially for muzzle blast?
Also, I'd welcome your opinions as to getting the small rear flip-sight for the A3 upper, and/or getting the extra detachable carry handle? I'd even listen to anyone who advocates just getting the A2 non-detachable upper instead. I prefer the "correct" military look and the down-the-road flexibility that the A3 offers, but cost-saving is also welcome. I'm willing to keep a completely open mind in this catagory. Any opinions are appreciated.
I do like the idea of reduced weight because I want this carbine as handy as possible. That's why I like the idea of the Stubby stock. Many people, for example, find the AK-47 stock to be too short. But I find it very handy and quick to employ, even with my large size. The AR-15 A2 stock is good, but is a bit cumbersome to shoulder, in comparason. I don't find the shorter stock to be an impediment to accuracy at all. Also, the stubby stock seems a hell of a lot more durable to the pinned-open CAR stock. This particular CAR stock seems to be the WORST of both worlds- less handy and more cumbersome to employ than the Stubby, and less durable than the full-size and Stubby stocks. IMHO, the pinned-open CAR stock is just a gimmick to appeal to those Weekend Commandos out there. I know: each to their own, but this is the way I feel.
Thanks for listening and helping.