Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Whats the reasoning with the military going from the govt profile to the HBAR on the M16A2?
|
?? The military does NOT use HBAR on the M16A2/A3/A4.
It looks like an HBAR after the front sight tower, but under the handguards it is thinner. An HBAR AR (20") rifle weights 8.5 lbs, an M16A2 weights 7.5 lbs, even though they look pretty much the same with the handguards on.
|
yeah, it's thicker up front to either:
a. prevent the rifle from being used as a prybar
or
b. prevent damage to the rifle WHEN it is used as a prybar
|
The Addage of field expediancy:
If it's handy, use it! Easier to requisition replacements, than it is to re place requisitions (for the proper tools, that is!)
Many of us who had rifles in the service did use the rifle for a great many things besides hosing bullets. I have seen many incidences of M16's used as door stops, hatch supports on Bradley's, 113's and M1's.
Prybar is certainly a function of a rifle in the field (weather legitimate, or not is another discussion
)
While we are on the topic of addages, Here's another old addage we applied liberally, especially while drinking at local German Establishments:
If you take soemthing that ain't nailed down, it not considered stealing. If it IS nailed down, it can always be pried up.
Cheers!