User Panel
their chambers are for 5.56; no questions or doubts there
yes(not sure on the varmiter bbls) just a tad better than rra(my opinion)--colt sucks not yet; got a banned one--it runs excellent they function well, but i suggest you look around for other, cheaper usgi mags--cathcht he deals |
|
|
|
|
your gun broker might just be pushing colt, since they cost more
BUSHMASTER all the way |
|
How can Bushmaster use mi-spec parts if NOT ALL their barrels, bolts and barrel carriers are not through MP (magnetized particle) testing? A rep. from Bushmaster even posted that here on ARFCOM. Colt and FN MP every single one those parts for their weapons.
thanks, Ron |
|
That statement makes you a bit suspect to me... RRA has infltrated the AR15 world so heavily now, they are a standard of sorts. No one says you have to like the company or the product, but it is awfully rare to find messages from people griping about RRA quality. And when RRA is supposed to be the #1 represented rifle at Camp Perry, that seems awfully hard to believe. |
|
|
Bushmaster does MP inspect barrels as they are so marked BMP1/9NATO and they say their bolts and carriers are too just not marked.
|
|
It may be marked MP on each and every barrel but they DO NOT MP each and every barrel. They test a sample out of each lot. This was from a previous thread by a rep from Bushmaster.
thanks Ron |
|
This is true. LMT MP inspects all barrels though, I don't know about bolts. |
|
|
Bushy, RRA, those are the two I like most. Best quality for the price. Screw Colt.
|
|
Just because all the Bushy owners out there like to chant "Bushmaster is the best" does not necessarily make it so. Bushmaster have had more than their fair share of significant quality problems. They are also a bit "economical with the truth" when it comes to the whole "milspec" thing.
I rate Bushmaster no better than the rest of the pack, and IMHO its not worth paying "over the odds" just to have their snake on the side of your mag well. Just my 2 cents worth. |
|
This thread is silly. Everyone knows that Hesse makes the best AR's. Jeeesh.
|
|
They have chrome lined, lightweight barrels, forged receivers and sights, "standard" internals, good QC on heat treat on bolts/carriers with chrome lined carriers. Generally speaking, Bushmaster makes the closest rifle to an M16 out there.
Sorta. They use the right steel, they heat treat everything correctly, but they don't magnaflux their bolts. And, of course, they are AR15 semiauto parts and there is no military spec for those.
In fit and finish, I'd rank them: 1. Armalite 2. Colt 3. Bushmaster 4. RRA In most like a "military rifle" (proper weights/part manufacture/tolerences): 1. Bushmaster 2. RRA 3. Tie: Armalite Colt
Nope. I converted my preban to an M4.
I don't know why they wouldn't, but I buy USGI becuase they do and they are cheaper. |
|||||
|
Edited to add: I was unaware that Colt stopped chrome lining civilian barrels when I posted. Bushmaster really would have the edge in such a category.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not pushing Colt and just bought Bushy. When the Armed Forces always have, and are currently using Colt I'd say that makes Colt the closest thing to military specs. |
|
Colt doesn't chrome line the barrels on their civilian rifles, and doesn't sell bayonet lugs or flash hiders to us lowly civilians. If you're buying a Colt M16A2 or a Colt M4A1, it's definately "Most Like A Military Rifle", but most of us can't legally do that. When it comes to selling military style rifles to civilians, Bushmaster will come a lot closer than Colt. |
|
|
1. Bushmaster has 4150 barrels, though not magnafluxed and proof tested like Colt (and LMT?). 2. No. No AR-15 manufacturer does, not even Colt. 3. Honestly, I have a Bushmaster and I love it, but Colts have a bit better QC. But all ARs (homebrew, Olympic, DPMS - all the way up to LMT and Colt) are essentially the same design, and they can all run fine. Quality control is the only (admittedly major) difference. 4. Nope. I've retrofitted my Superlight, though. here Bottom line, if you want a Bushmaster, get it. They're good rifles at a good price. If you have any problems, call Bushmaster and they will make it right. I won't say they're the best AR, because they aren't, but mine runs perfectly and shoots accurately, so ... yeah . |
|
|
|
||
|
Good point Iram, but features was not listed in BB's criteria. I didn't even look at any Colts but here in NY I can't get any of them with the goodies even if the manufacturers want to sell them to me. I held one Colt A2 (no evil features) that had a scope on the carry handle just to see if I would find it uncomfortable and I know for a fact it had a chrome lined 1/7 barrel on it. Not sure if it was swapped or special ordered though
|
|
How do Bushys' rank? I'll give you my opinion. They make a good ar15. So does Armalite, Colt, and Rock River. I own an Armalite m15 and a Rock River Entry Tatical (no ban). What I love about mine is the LIFETIME WARRANTY. I'm a warranty whore! Armalite and RRA both have awesome Customer Service (shame on Colt). All things mechanical do break and I love to shoot. Oh, and it took a week to get my no ban RR Entry. I also try to get most of my collection fromDavidsonsbecause of the no question asked lifetime warranty.
hock.gifI'm a dirty, dirty warranty whore!!!!!! |
|
their customer svc is outstanding. i wish their quality control was as good. how hard can it be to put a fsb on straight?
|
|
if you read further you would have noticed they are using a new technique that checks the parts more thoroughly than MP alone. Get with the program and dont leave out the "rest of the story" BM wa honest enough to let us know what was asked and i respect the honesty. |
|
|
I based it on the components being as close to milspec as you can. Colt rifles have different sized pins on the fire control parts then military (and any other AR), and the barrels (at least in the mact targets) have only chrome lined chambers, not bores. Also, the Colt MTs have plastic buffers I believe; not sure. Heres a good article written by Forest. Kinda big, here's part of it:
|
||
|
Good quality barrels (4150 steel & chrome lined), good customer service, pretty good adherance to the the drawings.
No manufacturer uses all military spec parts in their products. There is no military spec for AR-15 parts - and you can't legally use the M16 firecontrol parts. Also everyone's lowers has mods in them to prevent installation of the auto sear. Also for telestocks - only Colt uses the proper mil-spec dimensioned tube.
In terms of production numbers for the commercial market - they often rank #1. As far as quality of product (measured in realibility out of the box) most rank them #2 behind Colt. |
|||
|
I think RR are just as good as Bushmaster. The price is cheaper. That will be my next build. I think colts are sloppy. Just my 2 cent.
|
|
BB - Yeah, Colt has been a little screwy with their civilian offerings. Considering the whole barrel chroming issue alone I'd retract my statement. The only one I saw recently, a civilian version, had a chrome lined 1/7 so I was unaware of the fact that they had stopped doing it on the civilian versions. I wouldn't consider an unlined bore to be like a military rifle at all. I've read so much lately about people getting pissed that Colt is not making bayo lugs an available option that I totally missed the chrome issue. Sorry.
|
|
Ford!!!!!!!!!
.45acp!!!!!!!!! 7.62NATO!!!!!!! Oh, back to your questions:
The assumption with your question is that Bushmaster IS better. They are pretty damn good, but so are Armalite, Colt, RRA, LMT, and some of the new smaller companies. This really boils down to who you "like"......Ford vs. Chevy.....45acp vs. 9mm......etc.
No. I don't see an auto sear, a full shrouded & full circle bolt carrier, or a selector switch that rotates around to the back. Do you? Do their M4's have the feedramps done?
They are #1 in total civilian sales. Other rankings are subjective and boil down to Ford vs. Chevy, etc....
Stick with USGI mags..... |
||||
|
I have heard anectdotal stories on the 'net about problems with Bushmasters, but I have personally never seen one. I worked at a gunshop for two years and sold 'em by the truckload and never had a single one come back. That says alot more to me than somebody posting on the web. I really don't give a shit about milspec and/or all this stupid contoversy over MP testing. Talk about grasping at straws. Yes, I agree that it's somewhat deceiptful to test a sampling but mark all the barrels, but since I've never seen a problem with one of hte barrels, what do I care how they test it? To answer your specific questions:
For me it's price, features, and selection. They offer more configurations (and will custom configure rifles and uppers for you) than any other manufacturer I know of. They have barrels made of te best steel and they are chrome lined. They have 5.56 chambers. They also support the hell out of the civilian shooting market, unlike some other makers. That goes a long way with me.
The short answer is no. However that's a loaded question as neither do any of the other manufacturers.
In quality I think they are better than anyone else, and on par with Colt. As a company I think they are head and shoulders above any other firearms company out there today.
I have not. I "no-banned" my postban with an LMT upper and Magpul stock.
I don't know about the new ones, but I have one from around 1998 or so (they used to still ship their rifles with 30s they had left over after the ban) and it has always functioned just fine. |
|||||
|
an·ec·dot·al Based on casual observations or indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis. You're saying every Bushmaster owner who has reported an improperly staked gas carrier key or improperly torqued barrel - problems that were admitted by Bushmaster - as casual observations that didn't happen. Hmm, so when I casually observed the carrier key coming loose on my Bushmaster's bolt, that really didn't happen. Gotcha.
No one says these problems warrant taking the rifle back, but they have had to be returned to Bushmaster for (excellent) warranty repair, which is completely different. |
||
|
Don't get your panties in a wad, I'm not calling you a liar. Quite frankly I couldn't care less if you're telling the truth or not. I am more inclined to believe the things I see with my own eyes or experience firsthand. I never saw a problem, and I never had a customer complain about a problem. If you think that everyone that buys a product with a problem takes care of the problem themselves then you've obviously never worked in retail. My point is that I don't think that it's nearly as widespread, especially at this time, as people make it out to be. Your post is a rarity, as you generally hear from people that "know" all about Bushmaster's problems, but have never experienced or seen one firsthand. |
|||
|
I WOULD NOT SAY RRA IS A LOW END UNIT, AFTER ALL IT PASSED THE DEA TEST WITH FLYING COLORS, AND THEY ORDERED 5,000 RIFLES OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD IN DEC OF 2003.
|
|
FWIW, I have personally seen and/or experienced a loose carrier key, a burr on the feedramp causing feed failures, several cases of excessive windage, and magwells that were too tight. Here is something I haven't seen before. While I have seen many very good Bushy's locally, I have also seen more Bushy's with issues than any other brand. The group I shoot with has a good mix of Bushmasters, RRA's, Colts, Armalites, Olympics, and frankenguns. |
||||
|
Back in July I started a thread soliciting actual reliability data on all the AR manufacturers. While the data set was not really big enough to draw a lot of conclusions about "which brand is best", one of the big surprises was the comparatively large number of people who had bought defective Bushmaster rifles. Out of the 79 rifles reported, 29 rifles (37%) were defective. This included one police department that received 11 out of 18 rifles with loose carrier keys. Other problems included over-torqued barrels, defective gas tubes, incorrect headspace and defective gas rings. Again, while not a large sample, this is HARD DATA. Honestly, given the loyalty of many Bushmaster owners here, I was astounded by the survey respondents candor. Yes, in all these cases Bushy did "make it right" in the end, but I would hope a company with a name like "Quality Parts" would work harder to get it right first time. |
|
|
The biggest know against RR is they built uppers that were out-of-spec, denied it, then admitted it but refused to fix them. |
|
|
I love FACTS. But hey, Bushmaster is on your side (since your side is the ONLY side Bushmaster has) LOL! |
||
|
I have/had 4 Bushmaster rifles, all function flawlessy, thoiugh there were variances in the lowers to accomodate an RDIAS. As I said, they were all flawless. Again, while not a large sample, this is HARD DATA. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.