<edit>
I originally posted this because I thought the flat spot on the top of my stock where the reinforcing ring is ground off was the result of sloppy workmanship by the person who removed the mold flashing from my stock. DM1975 explained, however, that the flat spot is by design to allow the charging handle to be pulled back. Therefore, I have changed the title of this thread from the original (I now realize innaccurate and unfair) "Shoddy workmanship on RRA 6-position stock" to the current (neutral and more descriptive) "Flat spot on mouth of 6-position stock".
For the sake of full disclosure, though, I am leaving the original post so people can see how big a foot I put in my mouth. I am also still interested in answers to my questions about the origins of the various stocks, if anyone knows them.
Sorry to RRA (and whoever actually makes their stocks) for unfairly maligning their product.
</edit>Like many, I purchased a telescoping stock after the ban expired. The particular model I purchased was an RRA 6-position M4-style stock. Prior to ordering it I read a number of favorable reviews stating that the RRA stock is decently constructed and reasonably priced, so I decided it was a good choice for my first venture into adjustable stocks.
I received my stock last week and found that the reviews are, on the whole, accurate. The stock is decently constructed. However, there is one small matter I am unhappy with. The employee who removed the plastic flashing from the seam that runs along the top of the stock also sanded off the molded reinforcing ring around the mouth of the stock:
That is probably the weakest part of the stock due to the presence of the seam and the relatively thin wall of the stock in that area.
I contacted the vendor from which I purchased the stock, and they said that my stock is normal. They checked their supply of RRA stocks and all are the same.
I have no reason to disbelieve the vendor, and the ground off reinforcement probably isn't that big an issue since I don't think that particular area of the stock is exposed to much stress. When the recoil drives the stock into my shoulder I believe the offset of the stock toe will twist the stock against the buffer tube so that the forces will be concentrated in the bottom-front and top-back areas, not the top-front.
Still, it is frustrating to yet again purchase a brand new product and find that it isn't quite right. I don't expect perfection, but to me this is sloppy workmanship. What do you think? Are my expectations unreasonable?
Also, does anyone know who actually makes RRA stocks? I've read that both Bushmaster and RRA stocks are made by a third party, but I don't know for certain if this is true and I don't know who that third party actually is. It isn't Cavalry Arms, is it? And who makes the DPMS stocks?
Finally, for people who have purchased RRA stocks in the past, have they always been this way? I'm curious if this is a result of rushing production to meet the surge in demand caused by the expiration of the ban.