This looks more like a wrongful arrest case than a 2nd amendment case... He has the wrong spin on the 2nd amentment though, he isnt going after it logicaly like Silveria v Lockyer is. Brad is not really arguing an individual's right to bear arms, as his site states that he was in the militia and would use that to argue his point - which could be dangerous, as it might cause the court to decide that yes, indeed, only militia members have the right to bear arms.
If I had to choose which of the two cases would go to the supreme court, I would push Silveria v Lockyer forward.
Maybe I'm dazed and confused and dont have my facts straight, but it looks like SvL has a stronger argument actually [i]pertaining to the 2nd Amendment[/i] not wrongful arrest/prosecution charges.
My $.02
-Lee