Quoted:
Is it the caffeine that causes the crash or the sugar? I was under the impression that sugar is what causes the crash and caffeine, as a stimulant, just gives you a temporary pick up. Just like when people drink coffee in the morning, they don’t have a huge crash after lunch. So if you avoid the sugar in choosing supplements then you should be relatively fine.
Am I wrong? Please let me know, I am not trying to be confrontational in the least.
Thanks.
Oh yeah, you're wrong. Try eating "No Doze" and stay up for a couple days. A tank could run through your house and you wouldn't notice. You really don't get that much caffine from a couple cups of coffee.
There's a crash from any stimulant and sugar is far more natural than some pharmaceutical.
Probably the best is adrenaline.
Since my time in the military, I have been totally convinced a person is far better off training their body than relying on chemical stimulants. Its amazing how little sleep one can really get by with if one learns how. Being able to nod in seconds and grab fast snatches of sleep, one can go easily three days without a solid nights sleep and actually be able to function fairly well for that time period.
Show me someone on speed for three days and I'll show you an irrational wreck that if he tried to shave himself, he'd cut his throat. They don't call that stuff "Crank" for nothing. Speed alters ones mind where sugar does not.
A good study on sugar is reading up on Krebs cycle or how the body turns nutrients into energy. Where once your body runs out of sugar it naturally switches to other sources of energy, a stimulant just ends and there is no natural progression. Both are stimulating your metabolic rate (that's why speeds are used to lose weight), however natural things like sugar have natural progressions where an artificial stimulant just shuts everything down thus called a "crash". Sugar is a part of Krebs cycle while pharmaceuticals only stimulate it.
Tj