the rate was consolidated with another just before I left. I don't remember what the rate was but I'm sure it was related
View Quote
[b]EOD_Guy[/b] is more or less right (and here I thought you might have a little sense and you reveal that you're an Army puke). My uncle was an SFC when he retired in '71. In '72 the NAV combined this along with pipefitters (FP) and damage controlmen (DC) into hull maintenence technicians (HT). Because the RATING was so broad, in '86 the NAV opted to split the RATING and reintroduce the DC RATING.
At one time there were also carpenter's mates (CM) which were a welder-type RATING as well.
the numbers are the 'class' of skill
View Quote
No, the numerical identifier refers to the RATE or paygrade. If the gentleman in question was an SF2, then he was a shipfitter second class (an E-5).
For the last frigging time, RATE refers to PAYGRADE, RATING refers to skill.
SFs were on EVERY ship in the Navy. Tough tracking that one down without a hull number.
SFs, and their related ratings (except DC) were plumbers, welders, sewer specialists, etc. They were part of the engineering group of ratings.
Prior to my uncle's retirement, a conference of senior enlisted SFs, FPs, and DCs (along with a few corresponding warrant and mustang types) was called in San Diego to write a set of PARs (personnel advancement requirements) for the new combined RATING. Naturally, these guys started bitching and bellyaching that the new RATING would be too broad. The BUPERS assfaces said tough, it's already decided. Write the PARs. Years later, a light comes on in their dim little minds and the rating is broken up.