First, background:
I'm currently in the LEO academy, though not hired on with an agency. When I am trained and graduate, I will basically be a free agent, ready to go to nearly any agency in Florida. Problem is, I can't leave here.
Family commitments are forcing me to remain where I am, at least for a while.
Now, I am currently a dispatcher, and have been for coming up on 9 years. This has given me a great perspective on the job of a cop, since I go out of my way to work and learn with the intention of becoming an LEO. When it comes to the day-to-day cop stuff, I'm way ahead of my class, and my work has done a great job of educating me for what we learn in the academy. With that said, I'm due to graduate in the latter half of this year, and the job market is, well....depressed. There's a LOT more available and quilified people here than there are jobs, and one very large state agency is being faced with layoffs. That's going to be putting experienced, already trained cops out into the job market. I'm quickly becoming certain that I'm not getting a job here anytime soon.
Now, the question:
It has come to my attention that another agency has recently fired their agency full-time armorer for misconduct. The armorer is a non-LEO, civilian position. I'm giving serious thought to applying for this position, not only to play with guns for a living, but I really believe it would be a great resume enhancement. My certification is good for 4 years, so I can bide my time as an armorer, and if push comes to shove, can do time as a reserve in order to maintain certification past that time, at least until the job market comes back around.
Does it sound like I'm on a good track with this line of thinking? Would a civilian armorer really add something good to my resume? Or is it just going to be more filler? If it's a waste of time, I can stay where I'm at, doing what I know and am good at. What say you?