While looking thru my fowarded junk email, I came across this subject & thought it cannot be true so I did a bit of browsing & came up with this Police Officer in Prison Because Her Police Dog Bit a Robbery Suspect

I have benn both a supporter & a basher of LEO's but this absolutely makes me sick. How come we never hear about this shit on the no spin zone? Even it it was, it needs to be in the forefront of the news!

I don't know where you live, but it was on our TV's daily! I know officers that worked in that squad, and they have stated that she is an UPSTANDING Officer. It is an absolute SHAME.
Prayers sent again.

Sean
Edited for spelling

I recall this being covered on the news here.  If I recall correctly, the police officer had other questionable instances where she released her dog on suspects.

In any event, read the the 4th Cir. opinion posted by Aimless and see whether you still thinks she shouldn't have been convicted based on the evidence adduced at trial.

And.... for a more balanced perspective on Cpl. Mohr.

FBI Investigating Pr. George's Canine Unit
 
Kheenan Sneed, 17, says he was taking a nap in a neighbor's hammock when a police dog attacked him. At right is Sneed's mother, Lisa Sneed.
(By Lois Raimondo — The Washington Post)

By Ruben Castaneda
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, April 4, 1999; Page A1

Asleep in her own bed, napping in the early afternoon after working a late-night shift, Esther Vathekan was jolted awake by "pain in my head, something lifting my head and shaking it."

A German shepherd nearly as big as the 96-pound Vathekan, was tearing away at the back of her scalp. Suddenly the dog released its powerful grip, stepped around and chomped into her head, its teeth tearing into flesh above and below Vathekan's right eye. She heard the bones cracking in her face. "That's when I thought I was going to die," said Vathekan, 50.

The dog was a Prince George's County police dog, sent into a rented basement apartment in Vathekan's Takoma Park home to look for a possible burglar. Police say the dog used its teeth to turn the doorknob of the first-floor door and then bounded into Vathekan's bedroom.

Prince George's Canine Units
Named in Lawsuits Three current or former members of the Prince George's County police department's 23-person canine unit are named in eight of 18 pending or recently resolved lawsuits involving police dog bites between 1993 and 1998. Prince George's police and the county attorney have refused to discuss any of the cases but submitted some written responses. Details on the incidents are from court records, interviews with the victims and the county's written responses.

Cpl. Stephanie Mohr is named in three pending lawsuits. Mohr, 28, joined the police department in 1993, according to a court deposition.


Aug. 3, 1997: Kheenan Sneed, 16, of Forest Heights was sleeping in a neighbor's hammock when he was awakened by Mohr's police dog biting him in the leg, according to a lawsuit filed in Prince George's County Circuit Court. Mohr and another officer allegedly beat Sneed about the head with their flashlights or batons while the dog continued to bite him. Sneed and his mother said officers told them they were chasing a man who tried to break into a nearby store.

April 24, 1997: David Jones, 16, stole a car in Bowie and led Prince George's County officer on a high-speed chase into the District. According to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, two Prince George's county officers, Cpl. M. Warren and Cpl. J. Schreiber, broke the driver's side window, hit Jones in the head with their batons, pepper-sprayed him and yanked him out of the car after the car ran out of gas. Once Jones was outside the car, the officers allegedly continued to beat him, tried to blast pepper spray into his mouth, then handcuffed the teenager face-down on the street. Mohr arrived and allegedly let loose her dog, which bit Jones once in the upper left arm. Jones said that Mohr told him, "You must want to die" before setting her dog loose.

Aug. 26, 1996: Cpl. Ronnie Quick ran a check on a car that Bryan A. Diggs was standing near in Capitol Heights. Quick approached Diggs, who ran away. Quick fired three shots at the unarmed Diggs, striking him in the thigh. Diggs says he crawled into a wooded area until he reached a barbed wire fence, then cried out that he had been shot. About 15 minutes later, Mohr and her police dog arrived. According to the lawsuit filed in Prince George's County Circuit Court, Mohr ordered the dog to attack Diggs, and Diggs was bitten repeatedly on his left bicep.

Cpl. Anthony Mileo is named in two pending lawsuits. According to a deposition filed in connection with one of the lawsuits, Mileo, who is 33, joined Prince George's police in 1989 and joined the canine unit in 1992.


Nov. 19, 1997: Willie Walker was stopped in the 4800 block of Nash Street in Capitol Heights when patrol Cpl. Raymond M. Kane ordered him to stand against the police cruiser to be frisked. According to the lawsuit filed in Prince George's County Circuit Court, Kane touched Walker in "an offensive and inappropriate manner." Walker ran to the nearby home of a cousin. Mileo arrived and allegedly released his dog, which bit Walker in the leg while Mileo and Kane allegedly hit him with their batons. Walker contends that he was not resisting. A witness reported that the dog was "chewing on" Walker even after he was handcuffed.

Oct. 21, 1997: Mileo and other officers investigated a stolen van at the intersection of Booth Lane and Chapelwood Lane in Capitol Heights. In a sworn deposition in the case he filed in Prince George's Circuit Court, Julius LaRosa Booker testified he was in the van with a prostitute. When the officers arrived, Booker ran from the van. Mileo released his dog, who apprehended Booker by biting him in the leg. Mileo allegedly began hitting Booker in the head and back. Booker was handcuffed, after which the dog allegedly continued to bite him. Booker was hospitalized for three weeks after the incident. Huge chunks of his calf were ripped out by the dog.

County attorneys, without admitting any wrongdoing by Officer Daniel Russell or police, have settled two civil suits naming Russell, and in 1996, a federal civil jury found against the police department in a case involving Russell and his dog. A deposition filed in connection with a lawsuit shows that he is 34, joined the Prince George's County Police Department in 1986 and served in the canine unit from 1989 to 1994.


January 1996: A civil jury awarded Timothy Sean Traynor $16,500 and $50,000 in attorneys' fees in a lawsuit against Russell and another officer alleging battery, violation of civil rights and unlawful arrest. The suit arose from a January 1993 incident in which county officers went to Traynor's home in Laurel to arrest him on a burglary warrant. While officers blocked off both ends of the street, Traynor squirmed through a hatch into an attic. An officer ordered Traynor to come out, hands-first. Traynor complied. "As soon as I hit the ground, he let the dog on me," Traynor said in an interview. Traynor was bitten on his right hip and his upper left thigh; a chunk of flesh from his thigh was bitten off.

May 1997: County attorneys agreed to pay Robert Frank Taylor $15,000 to settle the lawsuit he brought against Russell and Sgt. Joseph Wing for using excessive force while arresting him inside a warehouse. According to court records, on Sept. 10, 1993, Wing pulled Taylor down from the loft of a warehouse he had broken into. Taylor was not handcuffed but, Wing, a former canine officer, allowed a police dog unleashed by Russell to attack Taylor. Wing yelled "tear it off" as the dog bit into Taylor's right leg.

May 1997: County attorneys agreed to pay a $5,000 settlement to Paul Glen Hamilton. According to court records, on April 28, 1994, Russell and other officers went to Hamilton's home to serve arrest warrants for contempt, battery, stalking and driving with a suspended license. Hamilton tried to escape through a window but was confronted by Russell and his dog. Hamilton stopped when Russell ordered him to, but the officer released the dog, which bit Hamilton's legs.


She is one of hundreds of people bitten by Prince George's police dogs in the past few years, part of what some victims contend is at best police recklessness and at worst a vicious brand of street justice inflicted by police dogs that are trained to bite suspects or anyone else they come upon.

Prince George's dogs are trained to bite, in sharp contrast to some other police departments that train their dogs to bark and hold a suspect until police arrive. And unlike most other departments, Prince George's police say they keep virtually no records of dog bites or their severity.

But internal police records turned over in a lawsuit show that dogs handled by the eight members of one canine squad bit 60 people between January and November 1998. In Montgomery County, by contrast, dogs handled by 13 officers bit people half as often – 30 times – in 1998.

According to 18 lawsuits, Prince George's County police sometimes let dogs loose to attack whomever they encounter and, at other times, order them to bite suspects already subdued or handcuffed. In 10 of the 18 lawsuits, victims contend they were attacked even though they were not resisting arrest, were on the ground or were handcuffed. In four incidents, according to the lawsuits, officers ordered their dogs to bite the victims after they were already subdued.

The people who have filed suit represent a cross section of the county's population: men, women, teenagers, blacks, whites and, in Vathekan's case, Indian. And the attacks occurred throughout the county: Forest Heights, Laurel, Lanham, Capitol Heights, even on the Capital Beltway. One took place in the District.

Some were attacked by Prince George's dogs after they tried to run to escape arrest, and a few have criminal records. Others have no criminal records and, like Vathekan, were not breaking the law when they were attacked by police dogs.


Ibrahima Keita, then 16, was playing basketball with a friend inside the closed gym of Buck Lodge Middle School in Adelphi on Saturday, March 28, 1998. A county patrol officer and canine officer Michael Jackson, responding to a school alarm, found the two boys and ordered them to the ground. While they were on the ground, according to Keita's lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Jackson commanded his dog to attack Keita. The teenager suffered severe injuries to his left arm. No charges were filed against him.

Kheenan Sneed, 16, of Forest Heights, was sleeping in a neighbor's hammock on Aug. 3, 1997, when he was bitten in the leg by Cpl. Stephanie Mohr's dog and beaten by Mohr and another officer, according to Sneed's suit filed in Prince George's Circuit Court. The officers told Sneed's mother they were looking for a suspect who had robbed a nearby store. No charges were filed against Sneed.
Bryan A. Diggs ran from police on Aug. 26, 1996, after they approached him in Capitol Heights concerning a possible stolen car and an officer fired three shots at him, striking him in the thigh. Diggs crawled into a wooded area and called out that he had been shot, according to his lawsuit filed in Prince George's Circuit Court. Mohr and her dog arrived about 15 minutes later and she ordered the dog to attack Diggs, according to the suit. He was bitten repeatedly on his left arm. He was later convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle but was acquitted of resisting arrest and assault on an officer.
All of the officers involved in the suits are represented by county attorneys who have directed them not to discuss the cases.

Last week, a month after The Washington Post began reviewing police dog bite cases involving Prince George's County officers, the FBI began investigating whether the 23 officers of the county police department's canine unit engage in a pattern of using excessive force, FBI Special Agent Peter A. Gulotta Jr., a spokesman for the bureau's Baltimore field office, confirmed.

Gulotta declined to say what prompted the investigation. He said the FBI's findings will be turned over to U.S. Attorney Lynne A. Battaglia in Baltimore and the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to court records, not one complaint of excessive force against the Prince George's canine unit has been sustained this decade.

Prince George's Police Chief John S. Farrell, who has made reducing excessive force by his officers a hallmark of his tenure as chief, refused to be interviewed for this story, citing the advice of a county attorney. All but two of the 13 lawsuits pending in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt and Prince George's County Circuit Court involve incidents that occurred while Farrell has been chief.

County Executive Wayne K. Curry (D) said in an interview that he is not familiar with the specific allegations in the lawsuits.

But he said Farrell that has been successful in reducing complaints of excessive force against the department and that he has "utter confidence" that if the canine unit had an excessive force problem, Farrell would detect and remedy it.

"Our complaints [of excessive force] have declined dramatically; they're at record lows," Curry said. "That some people who are bitten by [police] dogs would file lawsuits is not surprising."

Advocates for the use of police dogs say they are effective for crowd control, building searches, narcotics detection and apprehension of fleeing suspects.

Prince George's police dogs are trained to "use the right arm as the primary target; however secondary target areas are other parts of the body which present themselves should the right arm not be available," according to a written reply to questions from The Post by police spokesman Royce D. Holloway. Police have refused to be interviewed about the canine corps.

But few of the lawsuits mention injuries to the right arm, citing instead injuries to nearly every other part of the body.

Attorneys for the dog bite victims charge that the continuing use of dogs as weapons by Prince George's officers stems primarily from the police department's failure to hold officers accountable for unnecessary and excessive dog attacks.

"It's a question of having the dogs bite when they don't have to," said Riverdale lawyer Terrell N. Roberts III, who represents Vathekan and three other people suing the police department over canine bites.

Three of the county's officers have been named in a total of eight suits. Five of those suits are pending, two have been settled and the department lost the other case in federal court in Greenbelt.


The police dogs, primarily German shepherds, are purchased from Germany and the former Czechoslovakia because of their breeding and superior physical attributes. The dogs have powerful jaws that can exert between 1,000 and 2,000 pounds of pressure per square inch and, when they bite, often leave gaping wounds, lingering pain, permanent scars, huge gaps where flesh has been ripped out, limps, nerve damage and tens of thousands of dollars in medical bills. Vathekan, for instance, has more than $60,000 in medical bills.

Experts on the use of dogs in police work say that the way a dog reacts on the job can be traced to two factors: the dog's training and the way the dog is handled by its commanding officer. In Prince George's, critics say, both are flawed.

One of the two basic methods of training is to teach the dogs to find someone and hold them at bay by barking loudly until officers arrive. The other way is to train dogs to bite and hold. County officers use the latter method.

The experts, who said they did not know about the specifics of Prince George's County dogs and training, said that in general the officer/handlers are responsible for cases of unnecessary and excessive biting, not the dogs themselves.

"The dog's doing what he's trained to do," said Richard Rogers of the U.S. Police Canine Association.

"A really good handler with good control can turn his dog loose on somebody and call the dog off before it bites somebody," said Herbert Mullican Jr., a former military dog trainer and author of a model police canine policy for the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

"I've done exercises like that," Mullican said. "The whole thing is a matter of training – it's control, control, control. There's no second-guessing involved; you know what that dog's going to do."

The IACP's guidelines also recommend detailed record-keeping of biting incidents, including photographs of the injuries inflicted. In contrast, Prince George's County officials said they keep virtually no records of police dog bites.

But canine units in neighboring police departments do keep detailed records of bites, record far fewer bites and are accused much less frequently of excessive force.

The 30 bites recorded in Montgomery County in 1998 occurred in the course of 183 apprehensions in which the dogs assisted, said Montgomery police Sgt. Lee Marsh. In 1997, the unit's dogs committed 34 bites in 202 apprehensions.

Marsh said Montgomery County police write three reports whenever one of their dogs bites someone: a report detailing how the bite or bites occurred and the injuries sustained, an apprehension form and a use-of-force form. Montgomery police also take photographs of bite wounds.

The documentation concerning bites is kept as long as the dogs are on the force, sometimes longer, Marsh said.

In the 14 years he has been in the canine unit, two civil suits involving dog bites have gone to trial in Montgomery County, Marsh said. About a half-dozen complaints of excessive force were investigated by the department's internal affairs unit during that time, Marsh said.

"If there were multiple complaints about the same team that resulted in internal affairs complaints or civil suits, it's something we would look at," Marsh said.

In the decade that the D.C. police department has faced more than 750 civil lawsuits alleging excessive force, a search of court records turned up only seven lawsuits against D.C. police canine officers.

The biting incidents detailed in lawsuits against Prince George's police represent just a small fraction of all serious bites committed by county police dogs, according to criminal defense lawyers and a private investigator who has interviewed dozens of people bitten by police dogs.

Christopher Griffiths, a defense lawyer with the Riverdale firm of Roberts & Wood, which is representing four people suing for county police dog bites, said as many as three dozen of the criminal defendants he deals with annually have been bitten by county police dogs.

Private investigator Sharon Weidenfeld said that last year after she interviewed a man in the Prince George's County detention center who had been bitten by a police dog, and asked him to refer anyone else who had been bitten by a police canine, she received four phone calls the next day from inmates who said they had been bitten.

Some lawyers said they see cases involving dog bites in which it was clear the victim was brutalized by a police dog, but they think it would be futile to file suit.

"Because most of them were suspected of committing a crime, it would be difficult to win [a civil excessive force] case in front of a jury," Griffiths said.

In February, an eight-person jury in U.S. District Court in Baltimore deadlocked on a civil case brought by Bowie teenager Julie Anne Brown against Prince George's County police and Cpl. David Favors, whose police dog bit Brown 33 times on July 31, 1997.

According to court records and testimony at the civil trial, Brown, who was 17 at the time, went into Robert Goddard Middle School in Lanham with two other teenagers after 2 a.m. on a warm summer night, setting off motion alarms.

Brown testified that she bought a soda from a machine and used the restroom. Soon the three teenagers saw police cars coming toward the school. One fled through an open window.

Brown and Lacey Knauer, now 17 and an honor student at DuVal High School in Lanham, sat on the floor and hid behind a desk, the two teenagers testified during the week-long trial.

They heard Favors's dog, Rony, running through the hallway unleashed, and at one point, Rony ran into the room they were in and then left. Minutes later, the dog sprinted in and bit Knauer on the leg, the girls testified.

After a few moments, according to testimony, the dog let go of Knauer and started biting Brown repeatedly.

"I was scared to death. I thought it was going to rip me apart," Brown testified. Both girls testified that Brown tried to cover her face but did not run or fight the dog and that Favors said, "Good dog, get her."

Favors told the jury that Brown tried to run away and kicked Rony. A second officer who joined Favors, John Willie Ivey Jr., testified that he did not see Brown try to run. The jury deadlocked six to two in favor of the department.

Others have suffered worse injuries from county police dogs.

Julius LaRosa Booker, 34, is missing huge chunks from his right calf, where a police dog handled by Cpl. Anthony Mileo tore into him on the night of Oct. 21, 1997. Booker, of Capitol Heights, spent three weeks in Prince George's Hospital Center after he was bitten. He now walks with a pronounced limp, and he says he can't stand for long before his right leg becomes swollen and painful.

His 4-year-old girl, Tanisha, is afraid to sit on his lap. "She asks me if it hurts," Booker said.

Robert M. Wilburn, of Temple Hills, was driving on the Beltway when he was pulled over by county officers after police were told that he had fired shots at a tow truck driver. He was quickly handcuffed and put on the ground face-down, according to a lawsuit filed in Prince George's County Circuit Court. A county police dog then mauled Wilburn's leg as two officers allegedly held him down. Police found no weapon, and Wilburn was not charged.

In response to written questions submitted by The Post, John A. Bielec, associate county attorney, said that the dog "escaped from the police cruiser and bit Mr. Wilburn by accident."

Wilburn spent 10 days in Prince George's Hospital Center and had surgery on his leg, which became infected, necessitating a second, four-day stay.

Now, six months after the attack, he goes to Georgetown University Hospital two days a week for painful physical therapy to strengthen his nerve-damaged leg.

Esther Vathekan was hospitalized for a week and had four surgeries after she was attacked by Castro, the dog commanded by Officer Jeffrey J. Simms.

Today, Vathekan lives in the same house where she was attacked. She says the slightest pressure – simply splashing water on her face – sends waves of pain through the right side of her head. At other times, the area is numb. But almost constantly, there is a trickle from her right eye because of blocked tear ducts; at night the tears crust on her cheek.

And the doorknob that police say Castro opened to get to her? She replaced it with a deadbolt.

The PG police have had a number of 'problems' the past few years, including multiple investigations by DOJ.

As much as I am pro police, after reading the legal record that was linked, it sounds as though she should have gone to prison.

"Sarge can he get a bite in"  WTF

Quoted: As much as I am pro police, after reading the legal record that was linked, it sounds as though she should have gone to prison. "Sarge can he get a bite in"  WTF

After reading that my opinion has changed also. Sad case!

Quoted: Quoted: As much as I am pro police, after reading the legal record that was linked, it sounds as though she should have gone to prison. "Sarge can he get a bite in"  WTF After reading that my opinion has changed also. Sad case!

That is fucked up like a football bat.

Quoted: Quoted: As much as I am pro police, after reading the legal record that was linked, it sounds as though she should have gone to prison. "Sarge can he get a bite in"  WTF After reading that my opinion has changed also. Sad case!

IMO, the officer should not be in jail, she was ill-trained. The dept. is negligent in this case and should bear the burden.

This is why it is imperative K9 handlers are carefully selected and HIGHLY TRAINED.

Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As much as I am pro police, after reading the legal record that was linked, it sounds as though she should have gone to prison. "Sarge can he get a bite in"  WTF After reading that my opinion has changed also. Sad case! IMO, the officer should not be in jail, she was ill-trained. The dept. is negligent in this case and should bear the burden. This is why it is imperative K9 handlers are carefully selected and HIGHLY TRAINED.

Wow, there's the voice of reason.  She deliberately lets a dangerous dog loose on an unresisting suspect so it can "get a bite" and you chalk it up to poor training?  Common sense, my friend, is something that should have told her that wasn't right.  

Are you the same guy who defended the cop in NOLA for tackling the little old lady from behind?

The dept. is negligent in this case and should bear the burden.

Agreed.  They should, like all departments that do this, be held liable for their decision to use animals to attack humans.  It's disgusting to hear, like one local handler bragged on the news, that watching animals attack humans "is fun just like watching bears and lions attack people in the [Roman] coliseum."z

Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As much as I am pro police, after reading the legal record that was linked, it sounds as though she should have gone to prison. "Sarge can he get a bite in"  WTF After reading that my opinion has changed also. Sad case! IMO, the officer should not be in jail, she was ill-trained. The dept. is negligent in this case and should bear the burden. This is why it is imperative K9 handlers are carefully selected and HIGHLY TRAINED.

Also, if you read the Washington Post article from 1999 it states that Cpl. Mohr testified in an unrelated deposition that department procedure was to only release the dog for self defense.   Applying the facts in the 4th Cir. Court of Appeals decision, how can you say she should be absolved from criminal liability when she violated that very policy?

You do a disservice to all police when you defend the bad apples.

While the vast majority of law enforcement officers perform their duties in a courageous, professional and courteous manner, a small number behave as if they are members of an occupying army, and all of the citizens they ostensibly serve are the enemy.  Officers who behave in this manner, or act as if they are above the laws, have no place in law enforcement.  As a law enforcement officer, you should hold yourself to a higher standard, and your conduct both on and off duty should be above reproach.  Officers who willfully violate the laws and Constitution they have sworn to uphold should be punished like any other wrongdoer.

To those who complain that the stress of enforcing the law and dealing with the public is simply too much, I would respond:  "Tough shit.  Go be a florist or a librarian or something if you can't handle the stress.  Nobody drafted you, you volunteered to be a cop.  If you can't do your job in a respectful and professional manner, go do something else."

As to those who would chalk up the decision to allow a vicious animal to maim an unarmed and compliant person  just for kicks to "poor training".... that is really weak.