For the purposes you're describing, this is our US (Federal) definition of a "firearm"
(sounds very similar to your Canadian law) (things change when you go to 26 US Code "Chapter " 56 of the tax laws that deal with machine guns and short barreled rifles. So, make sure the resulting Norinco upper, US lower is at least 26" OAL and 16" barrel.)
18 US Code Sec.921
§ 921. Definitions (a) As used in this chapter— (3) The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon;
|
You sound like you may already know that we have a difference between US-legal receivers and US-legal, assembled-from-foreign-parts, finished rifles. (a foreign receiver can be US-legal, but requires a certain number of US-made parts in the finished firearm. For example, an Imbel receiver made in Brazil for an FAL is US-legal, but the finished FAL rifle must contain a certain number of US-made parts to be legal). I don't
think this is a problem with US-
made receivers, regardless of the foreign part content of the firearm. (I haven't found a citation to confirm this)
As LenS suggested, you should also check the state laws of where you're heading and passing thru in the US, but a US-
mfg receiver should be fine, as long as you are in compliance with importation, possession and transportation laws.
Cheers, Otto