Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 7/8/2001 1:06:49 PM EDT

If POSSESSION of an M-16 parts, in proximity to an AR is *conspiracy/whatever to manufacture*...


IS possession of EXTRA pre ban uppers, in proximity to a post ban lowers the same alphabet dream????
Link Posted: 7/8/2001 1:14:11 PM EDT
[#1]
CavVet, Do you mean you have several lowers? some pre- and some post-? I think the MG parralel may be trick because of what parts get counted as the "MG".

If you have a pre- lower and several pre- uppers, I don't see a problem. Even if you have post lowers also.

If you have post lowers and all pre- uppers there may be a problem.

If you have complete post- rifles and extra pre- uppers, I don't think that is proof of anything. I believe they need to [red]catch[/red] you with an illegal AW or have a statement of intent to create illegal AW's to be able to charge something like that.  

That's as best as I can reason it out.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top