User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/26/2004 4:35:07 PM EDT
[#1]
Umm... is this where I say AGNTSA?
It's NOT possible. You can't enforce something that doesn't exist, which it won't, after September. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2004 4:39:06 PM EDT
[#2]
WTF would you have then? Preban, postban and post-postban? I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2004 4:44:53 PM EDT
[#3]
never, it cannot happen, the law will be gone
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2004 7:18:15 PM EDT
[#4]
After September 14 it will be like the "assault weapon ban" never existed in the firts place. So there will be no question of pre, post and post-preban. Just my 02.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/30/2004 8:52:28 AM EDT
[#5]
No part of the law states that the guns made without these features in the time period of the ban must remain without the banned features.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/30/2004 9:34:14 AM EDT
[#6]
total rumor, do not believe it
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/1/2004 12:50:48 PM EDT
[#7]
BATFE has no legal authority to "Write" law (even if its called a "ruling"). All they can do is enforce existing law. After Sept 13th everything is legal (ie pre-ban)once again. Don't sweat it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/1/2004 12:52:57 PM EDT
[#8]
 there is nothing to base their ruling on..... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/2/2004 4:17:55 AM EDT
[#9]
NO!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2004 2:22:27 PM EDT
[#10]
The ATF can only rule on existing law. Without any applicable law, there's nothing to rule ON.
Therefore, after AWB sunset, no law=no rulings. Any and everything the ATF has come up with regarding the AWB becomes moot and has no legal weight AT ALL, PERIOD. All that paperwork might just as well be shredded, because it will become completely meaningless, irrelevant, and without force. For all purposes, on September 14 it will be as if the AWB never happened, and legally, we'll be right back where we were on September 12, 1994. And that, as they say, is that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2004 11:10:48 AM EDT
[#11]
A few points.
1. The term and concept "post-ban" is not a legal term. It is not part of the law. 2. The term and concept "LEO Restricted" has legal meaning and is part of the law. Therefore 1. A post-ban firearm is just a firearm. When and if the AWB expires, you can add any legal feature to it. 2. LEO Restricted items will probably be legal to own*. However, be advised that if any new ban is passed in the new few years, it is a 99% certainty than ALL "LEO Restricted" items will again be banned. Don't believe the stories that a new way to ID such items would be implemented. Philip * Warning I am not a lawyer, I just play one on the Internet. PK |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2004 1:46:25 PM EDT
[#12]
No problem, just get out your dremel tool and grind off the LEO ONLY marks. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2004 1:59:49 PM EDT
[#13]
Where's the not this shit again picture?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/9/2004 7:08:34 AM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
