Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 7/16/2002 3:52:12 PM EDT
I have been reading some of the posts in this section and have inferred from those posts that it is now necessary to involve a FFL holder in private firearm transactions.  I this true?!  If so, since when?!
Link Posted: 7/16/2002 3:56:26 PM EDT
[#1]
No, it's not true.  Some states have laws covering private transfers (Kalifornia), and many states have separate laws for handguns and long guns.  In many places, undocumented private transfers are legal.
Link Posted: 7/16/2002 6:03:08 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
I have been reading some of the posts in this section and have inferred from those posts that it is now necessary to involve a FFL holder in private firearm transactions.  I this true?!  If so, since when?!
View Quote


You can even ship that firearm (as long as its a rifle/shotgun) to a resident of your state. without paper... assuming your state dont have laws against it.
Link Posted: 7/17/2002 12:40:45 AM EDT
[#3]
Thanks guys.  I did a little research on the issue as well.  I was getting nervous/pissed there for a minute.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top