User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 7:16:48 AM EDT
[#1]
1. He owns the houses.
2. 30 days notice is within California law. Sounds about right. I find it interesting that the tenants are just now considering mold lawsuits. That should work out nicely for them in a state like California. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 7:18:01 AM EDT
[#2]
Boo hoo! Evil Japanese guy following the laws! Why is capitalism even allowed to continue in the Socialist Peoples Republik of Kalifornia?
"She said it appears that Kawamoto can legally give tenants, who rent on a month-to-month basis, just 30 days notice to vacate their homes -- the minimum required by state law." "She said her 13-year-old house on Garbo Way would sell for about $160,000, more if fixed up." Which means her P&I would be less than her $1100 a month rent even if she put zero down and only qualified for a 7% loan. So sorry Charlie, no tears here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 7:33:15 AM EDT
[#3]
If you're worried about being evicted on short notice, don't lease on a monthly basis!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 7:33:22 AM EDT
[#4]
What do these people expect? They rent and pay month to month without a lease. They should know that something like this could happen. The fact that he is doing it to everybody is irrelevant. After all, that is his right as the property owner.
Besides, the government does this all of the time in bigger cities to extremely poor families. It's called condemnation. The only difference between that situation and this one is that the families aren't poor and the government isn't doing the booting. Yeah, it sucks for those families, but.....[b]Welcome to life where all things don't smell like roses![/b] |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 7:34:56 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted: 1. He owns the houses. 2. 30 days notice is within California law. Exactly! What is the issue here anyway? There is nothing here to litigate. High Performance Tactical Gear! [url]www.Lightfighter.com[/url] |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 7:56:10 AM EDT
[#6]
The only issue is that the Caliban will sue him for following the law. Property owners will lose what little rights they have left.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 8:23:08 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted: Quoted: 1. He owns the houses. 2. 30 days notice is within California law. Exactly! What is the issue here anyway? There is nothing here to litigate. High Performance Tactical Gear! [url]www.Lightfighter.com[/url] The issue here is because the name is Kawamoto and not Johnson or Smith. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/12/2002 8:38:52 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: 1. He owns the houses. 2. 30 days notice is within California law. Exactly! What is the issue here anyway? There is nothing here to litigate. High Performance Tactical Gear! [url]www.Lightfighter.com[/url] The issue here is because the name is Kawamoto and not Johnson or Smith. Also, did you notice in the story how they mentioned all of the American flags in the neighborhood and the "In God We Trust" signs? |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
