Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 6/16/2009 7:48:13 PM EDT


High Court Rejects ‘Don’t Ask’ Challenge


           
           


           
           
       


       
       






       

WASHINGTON
- The Supreme Court on Monday agreed with the Obama administration and
upheld Pentagon policy barring gays and lesbians from serving openly in
the military.






The court said it will not hear an appeal from former Army Capt.
James Pietrangelo II, who was dismissed under the "don't ask, don't
tell" policy. The federal appeals court in Boston earlier threw out a
lawsuit filed by Pietrangelo and 11 other veterans. He was the only
member of that group who asked the high court to rule that the
Clinton-era policy is unconstitutional.






During last year's campaign, President Barack Obama indicated he
supported the eventual repeal of the policy, but he has made no
specific move to do so since taking office in January. Meanwhile, the
White House has said it won't stop gays and lesbians from being
dismissed from the military.






In court papers, the administration said the appeals court ruled
correctly in this case when it found that "don't ask, don't tell" is
"rationally related to the government's legitimate interest in military
discipline and cohesion."






Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman referred requests for comment to
the Justice Department, but said the military policy "implements the
law."






"The law requires the (Defense) Department to separate from the
armed services members who engage in or attempt to engage in homosexual
acts; state they are homosexual or bisexual; or marry or attempt to
marry a person of the same biological sex," Whitman said in a
statement.






A legal advocacy group vowed to press ahead with efforts to reverse the policy despite the legal setback.






"We don't see that at all as bad news for repeal," said Kevin Nix,
spokesman for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. "What happened
today puts the ball back into the court of Congress and the White House
to repeal the law, and that's where we think it should be right now."






Nix said there are no objective studies showing unit cohesion, morale and order are harmed by openly gay people.






"There are people out there and still serving, and the unit is not
crumbling beneath their feet," he said, adding that attitudes among
troops and society are far different than they were in the 1990s when
the policy was instituted.






"Times have changed ... fast forward 16 years," Nix said. "The
service members in Iraq and Afghanistan - their attitudes toward gay
people are very different than some retired generals in their 50s and
60s who served in the 20th Century. It's a different world."






Opposition to gay marriages, for example, has eased nationwide and
six states have legalized same-sex unions. New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, Vermont and Iowa allow gay marriage,
though opponents hope to overturn Maine's law with a public vote.






California briefly allowed gay marriage before a public vote banned
it; a court ruling grandfathered in couples who were already married.






Polls show younger Americans are far are more tolerant of gay marriage than are older generations.






The "don't ask, don't tell" policy was established in 1993.
President Bill Clinton had to abandon efforts to allow gays to serve
openly in the armed forces after facing strong resistance from the
military and members of Congress.






Last year, the federal appeals court in San Francisco allowed a
decorated flight nurse to continue her lawsuit over her dismissal. The
court stopped short of declaring the policy unconstitutional, but said
that the Air Force must prove that ousting former Maj. Margaret Witt
furthered the military's goals of troop readiness and unit cohesion.






The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was the first
that evaluated "don't ask, don't tell" through the lens of a 2003
Supreme Court decision that struck down a Texas ban on sodomy as an
unconstitutional intrusion on privacy.






The administration did not appeal that ruling to the Supreme Court and Witt's lawsuit is ongoing.






The appeals court in Pietrangelo's case also took the high court
decision into account, but concluded that it should defer to Congress'
determination that the policy fosters cohesion in military units.






The case is Pietrangelo v. Gates, 08-824.




       

 
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top